Information technology management based on computer dynamically adjusted discrete phases of event correlation

ABSTRACT

Management of a customer&#39;s IT environment is facilitated by correlating events that occur within the environment, obtaining information relating to those events, and performing actions, such as environment tuning or recovery actions, based on the information. Discrete phases of processing are used to obtain the information and/or perform the actions. One or more of these discrete processing phases have tunable time intervals associated therewith. That is, at least one time interval is dynamically adjusted based on the runtime state of the environment.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates, in general, to managing customer environments to provide support for business resiliency, and in particular, to dynamically adjusting discrete phases of event correlation to obtain event related information used in facilitating management of the environment.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Today, customers attempt to manually manage and align their availability management with their information technology (IT) infrastructure. Changes in either business needs or the underlying infrastructure are often not captured in a timely manner and require considerable rework, leading to an inflexible environment.

Often high availability solutions and disaster recovery technologies are handled via a number of disparate point products that target specific scopes of failure, platforms or applications. Integrating these solutions into an end-to-end solution is a complex task left to the customer, with results being either proprietary and very specific, or unsuccessful.

Customers do not have the tools and infrastructure in place to customize their availability management infrastructure to respond to failures in a way that allows for a more graceful degradation of their environments. As a result, more drastic and costly actions may be taken (such as a site switch) when other options (such as disabling a set of applications or users) could have been offered, depending on business needs.

Coordination across availability management and other systems management disciplines is either nonexistent or accomplished via non-reusable, proprietary, custom technology.

There is little predictability as to whether the desired recovery objective will be achieved, prior to time of failure. There are only manual, labor intensive techniques to connect recovery actions with the business impact of failures and degradations.

Any change in the underlying application, technologies, business recovery objectives, resources or their interrelationships require a manual assessment of impact to the hand-crafted recovery scheme.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Based on the foregoing, a need exists for a capability that facilitates management of an IT environment. In particular, a need exists for a capability that employs dynamically adjusted discrete phases of processing to obtain a set of event related information used in managing the environment. In one example, a time interval associated with a discrete processing phase is dynamically adjusted based on real-time status of the environment, which affects the obtained set of information.

The shortcomings of the prior art are overcome and additional advantages are provided through the provision of a computer-implemented method to facilitate event correlation. The method includes, for instance, executing a plurality of discrete phases of processing, in response to an occurrence of an event in an Information Technology (IT) environment, to obtain a set of related information associated with the event; and adjusting a time interval associated with at least one discrete phase of the plurality of discrete phases based on real-time status of the IT environment, said adjusting affecting the obtained set of related information.

Computer program products and systems relating to one or more aspects of the present invention are also described and claimed herein.

Additional features and advantages are realized through the techniques of the present invention. Other embodiments and aspects of the invention are described in detail herein and are considered a part of the claimed invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

One or more aspects of the present invention are particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed as examples in the claims at the conclusion of the specification. The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the invention are apparent from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1 depicts one embodiment of a processing environment to incorporate and use one or more aspects of the present invention;

FIG. 2 depicts another embodiment of a processing environment to incorporate and use one or more aspects of the present invention;

FIG. 3 depicts yet a further embodiment of a processing environment to incorporate and use one or more aspects of the present invention;

FIG. 4 depicts one embodiment of a Business Resilience System used in accordance with an aspect of the present invention;

FIG. 5A depicts one example of a screen display of a business resilience perspective, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention;

FIG. 5B depicts one example of a screen display of a Recovery Segment, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention;

FIG. 6A depicts one example of a notification view indicating a plurality of notifications, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention;

FIG. 6B depicts one example of a notification message sent to a user, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention;

FIG. 7 depicts one example of a Recovery Segment of the Business Resilience System of FIG. 4, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention;

FIG. 8A depicts examples of key Recovery Time Objective properties for a particular resource, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention;

FIG. 8B depicts one example in which Recovery Time Objective properties collectively form an observation of a Pattern System Environment, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention;

FIG. 9 depicts one example of a Containment Region and related data structures, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention;

FIG. 10A depicts one example of a sliding window timeline used in accordance with an aspect of the present invention;

FIG. 10B depicts another example of the timeline depicting delta increments, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention;

FIGS. 11A-11E depict one embodiment of the logic to calculate an interval window, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention;

FIG. 12 depicts one embodiment of the logic associated with processing a new Containment Region, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention;

FIGS. 13A-13C depict one embodiment of the logic used for customer modification of timings, in accordance with an aspect of the present invention;

FIGS. 14A-14J depict one embodiment of the logic for asynchronous query build processing used in accordance with an aspect of the present invention;

FIG. 15 depicts one embodiment of the logic for close sliding window processing used in accordance with an aspect of the present invention; and

FIG. 16 depicts one embodiment of a computer program product incorporating one or more aspects of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In managing a customer's environment, such as its business environment, there is a set of requirements unaddressed by existing technology, which causes unpredictable down time, large impact failures and recoveries, and significant extra labor cost, with resulting loss of business revenue. These requirements include, for instance:

-   -   1. Ensuring that there is a consistent recovery scheme across         the environment, linked to the business application, across the         different types of resources; not a different methodology         performed by platform silo. The recovery is to match the scope         of the business application, not limited in scope to a single         platform. The recovery is to be end-to-end and allow for         interaction across multiple vendor products. In one example, a         business application is defined as a process that is supported         by IT services. It is supportive of the products and/or services         created by a customer. It can be of fine granularity (e.g., a         specific service/product provided) or of coarse granularity         (e.g., a group of services/products provided).     -   2. Ability to group together mixed resource types (servers,         storage, applications, subsystems, network, etc.) into logical         groupings aligned with business processes requirements for         availability.     -   3. Ability to share resources across logical groups of         resources; ability to nest these logical group definitions, with         specifications for goal policy accepted and implemented at each         level.     -   4. Pre-specified recommendations for resource groupings, with         customization possible, and pattern matching customer         configuration with vendor or customer provided         groupings/relationships—to avoid requiring customers to start         from scratch for definitions.     -   5. Ability to group together redundant resources with functional         equivalence—use during validation when customer has less         redundancy than required to meet the Recovery Time Objective         (RTO) goal; in recovery to select an alternate resource for one         that has failed.     -   6. Ability to configure the definition of what constitutes         available, degraded, or unavailable based on customer's own         sensitivity for a given grouping of resources, and business         needs, and further aggregate the state across various resources         to produce an overall state for the business application. The         state is to be assessed real time, based on what is actually         occurring in the system at the time, rather than fixed         definitions. In some cases, a performance slowdown might flag a         degraded environment, and in other cases, a failure may be         necessary before flagging a degraded or unavailable environment.         The definitions of available, degraded and unavailable are to be         consumed by an availability system that evaluates them in the         context of a policy, and then determines appropriate action,         including possibly launching recovery automatically.     -   7. Ability to relate the redundancy capability of relevant         resources to the availability status of a business application.     -   8. Allow customers to configure when recovery actions can be         delegated to lower level resources, particularly since resource         sharing is becoming more relevant in many customer environments.     -   9. Include customer or vendor best practices for availability as         prespecified workflows, expressed in a standards based manner,         that can be customized.     -   10. Ability to specify quantitative business goals for the         recovery of logical groupings of resources, effecting both how         the resources are pre-configured for recovery, as well as         recovered during errors. One such quantitative goal is Recovery         Time Objective (RTO). As part of the specification of         quantitative business goals, to be able to include time bias of         applications, and facilitate the encoding of appropriate         regulatory requirements for handling of certain workloads during         changing business cycles in selected businesses, such as         financial services.     -   11. Decomposition of the overall quantified RTO goal to nested         logical groups; processing for shared groups having different         goals.     -   12. Ability to configure redundancy groupings and co-location         requirements with resources from other vendors, using a         representation for resources (which may be, for example,         standards based), with ability to clearly identify the vendor as         part of the resource definition.     -   13. Ability to use customer's own historical system measures to         automatically generate various system environments, then use         these system environments when specifying quantitative recovery         goals (since recovery time achievability and requirements are         not consistent across time of day, business cycle, etc.). The         function is to be able to incorporate historical information         from dependent resources, as part of the automatic generation of         system environments.     -   14. Specification of statistical thresholds for acceptability of         using historical information; customer specification directly of         expected operation times and directive to use customer specified         values.     -   15. Environments are matched to IT operations and time of day,         with automatic processing under a new system environment at time         boundaries—no automatic internal adjustment of RTO is to be         allowed, rather changed if the customer has specified that a         different RTO is needed for different system environments.     -   16. Goal Validation—Prior to failure time. Ability to see         assessment of achievable recovery time, in, for instance, a         Gantt chart like manner, detailing what is achievable for each         resource and taking into account overlaps of recovery sequences,         and differentiating by system environment. Specific use can be         during risk assessments, management requests for additional         recovery related resources, mitigation plans for where there are         potentials for RTO miss. Example customer questions:         -   1 What is my expected recovery time for a given application             during “end of month close” system environment?         -   What is the longest component of that recovery time?         -   Can I expect to achieve the desired RTO during the “market             open” for stock exchange or financial services applications?         -   What would be the optimal sequence and parallelization of             recovery for the resources used by my business application?     -   17. Ability to prepare the environment to meet the desired         quantitative business goals, allowing for tradeoffs when shared         resources are involved. Ensure that both automated and         non-automated tasks can be incorporated into the         pre-conditioning. Example of customer question: What would I         need to do for pre-conditioning my system to support the RTO         goal I need to achieve for this business application?     -   18. Ability to incorporate operations from any vendors'         resources for pre-conditioning or recovery workflows, including         specification of which pre-conditioning operations have effect         on recoveries, which operations have dependencies on others,         either within vendor resources or across resources from multiple         vendors.     -   19. Customer ability to modify pre-conditioning workflows,         consistent with supported operations on resources.     -   20. Ability to undo pre-conditioning actions taken, when there         is a failure to complete a transactionally consistent set of         pre-conditioning actions; recognize the failure, show customers         the optional workflow to undo the actions taken, allow them to         decide preferred technique for reacting to the failure—manual         intervention, running undo set of operations, combination of         both, etc.     -   21. Ability to divide pre-conditioning work between long running         and immediate, nondisruptive short term actions.     -   22. Impact only the smallest set of resources required during         recovery, to avoid negative residual or side effects for         attempting to recover a broader set of resources than what is         actually impacted by the failure.     -   23. Choosing recovery operations based on determination of which         recovery actions address the minimal impact, to meet goal, and         then prepare for subsequent escalation in event of failure of         initial recovery actions.     -   24. Choosing a target for applications and operating systems         (OS), based on customer co-location specifications, redundancy         groups, and realtime system state.     -   25. Ability for customer to indicate specific effect that         recovery of a given business process can have on another         business process—to avoid situations where lower priority         workloads are recovered causing disruption to higher priority         workloads; handling situations where resources are shared.     -   26. Ability to prioritize ongoing recovery processing over         configuration changes to an availability system, and over any         other administration functions required for the availability         system.     -   27. Ability for recoveries and pre-conditioning actions to run         as entire transactions so that partial results are appropriately         accounted for and backed out or compensated, based on actual         effect (e.g., during recovery time or even pre-conditioning, not         all actions may succeed, so need to preserve a consistent         environment).     -   28. Allow for possible non-responsive resources or underlying         infrastructure that does not have known maximum delays in         response time in determining recovery actions, while not going         beyond the allotted recovery time.     -   29. Allow customer to change quantified business recovery         goals/targets without disruption to the existing recovery         capability, with appropriate labeling of version of the policy         to facilitate interaction with change management systems.     -   30. Allow customers to change logical groupings of resources         that have assigned recovery goals, without disruption to the         existing recovery capability, with changes versioned to         facilitate interaction with change management systems.     -   31. Ability to specify customizable human tasks, with time         specifications that can be incorporated into the goal         achievement validation so customers can understand the full time         involved for a recovery and where focusing on IT and people time         is critical to reducing RTO.     -   32. There is a requirement/desire to implement dynamically         modified redundancy groupings for those resources which are high         volume—automatic inclusion based on a specified set of         characteristics and a matching criteria.     -   33. There is a requirement/desire to automatically add/delete         resources from the logical resource groupings for sets of         resources that are not needing individual assessment.

The above set of requirements is addressed, however, by a Business Resiliency (BR) Management System, of which one or more aspects of the present invention are included. The Business Resiliency Management System provides, for instance:

-   -   1. Rapid identification of fault scope.         -   Correlation and identification of dependencies between             business functions and the supporting IT resources.         -   Impact analysis of failures affecting business functions,             across resources used within the business functions,             including the applications and data.         -   Isolation of failure scope to smallest set of resources, to             ensure that any disruptive recovery actions effect only the             necessary resources.     -   2. Rapid granular and graceful degradation of IT service.         -   Discontinuation of services based on business priorities.         -   Selection of alternate resources at various levels may             include selection of hardware, application software, data,             etc.         -   Notifications to allow applications to tailor or reduce             service consumption during times of availability             constraints.     -   3. Integration of availability management with normal business         operations and other core business processes.         -   Policy controls for availability and planned             reconfiguration, aligned with business objectives.         -   Encapsulation, integration of isolated point solutions into             availability IT fabric, through identification of affected             resources and operations initiated by the solutions, as well             as business resiliency.         -   Goal based policy support, associated with Recovery Segments             that may be overlapped or nested in scope.         -   Derivation of data currency requirements, based on business             availability goals.

One goal of the BR system is to allow customers to align their supporting information technology systems with their business goals for handling failures of various scopes, and to offer a continuum of recovery services from finer grained process failures to broader scoped site outages. The BR system is built around the idea of identifying the components that constitute a business function, and identifying successive levels of recovery that lead to more complex constructs as the solution evolves. The various recovery options are connected by an overall BR management capability that is driven by policy controls.

Various characteristics of one embodiment of a BR system include:

-   -   1. Capability for dynamic generation of recovery actions, into a         programmatic and manageable entity.     -   2. Dynamic generation of configuration changes required/desired         to support a customer defined Recovery Time Objective (RTO)         goal.     -   3. Dynamic definition of key Pattern System Environments (PSEs)         through statistical analysis of historical observations.     -   4. Validation of whether requested RTO goals are achievable,         based on observed historical snapshots of outages or customer         specified recovery operation time duration, in the context of         key Pattern System Environments.     -   5. BR system dynamic, automatic generation and use of standards         based Business Process Execution Language (BPEL) workflows to         specify recovery transactions and allow for customer integration         through workflow authoring tools.     -   6. Ability to configure customized scopes of recovery, based on         topologies of resources and their relationships, called Recovery         Segments (RSs).     -   7. Best practice workflows for configuration and recovery,         including, but not limited to, those for different resource         types: servers, storage, network, and middleware, as examples.     -   8. Ability to customize the definition of available, degraded,         unavailable states for Recovery Segments.     -   9. Ability to represent customers' recommended configurations         via best practice templates.     -   10. Ability to define the impact that recovery of one business         application is allowed to have on other business applications.     -   11. Ability to correlate errors from the same or multiple         resources into related outages and perform root cause analysis         prior to initiating recovery actions.     -   12. Quantified policy driven, goal oriented management of         unplanned outages.     -   13. Groupings of IT resources that have associated, consistent         recovery policy and recovery actions, classified as Recovery         Segments.     -   14. Handling of situations where the underlying error detection         and notifications system itself is unavailable.

A Business Resilience System is capable of being incorporated in and used by many types of environments. One example of a processing environment to incorporate and use aspects of a BR system, including one or more aspects of the present invention, is described with reference to FIG. 1.

Processing environment 100 includes, for instance, a central processing unit (CPU) 102 coupled to memory 104 and executing an operating system 106. Examples of operating systems include AIX® and z/OS®, offered by International Business Machines Corporation; Linux; etc. AIX® and z/OS® are registered trademarks of International Business Machines Corporation, Armonk, N.Y., U.S.A. Other names used herein may be registered trademarks, trademarks or product names of International Business Machines Corporation or other companies.

The operating system manages execution of a Business Resilience Runtime Component 108 of a Business Resilience System, described herein, and one or more applications 110 of an application container 112.

As examples, processing environment 100 includes an IBM® System Z™ processor or a pSeries® server offered by International Business Machines Corporation; a Linux server; or other servers, processors, etc. Processing environment 100 may include more, less and/or different components than described herein. (pSeries® is a registered trademark of International Business Machines Corporation, Armonk, N.Y., USA.)

Another example of a processing environment to incorporate and use aspects of a BR System, including one or more aspects of the present invention, is described with reference to FIG. 2.

As shown, a processing environment 200 includes for instance, a central processing complex 202 coupled to an input/output (I/O) subsystem 204. Central processing complex 202 includes, for instance, a central processing unit 206, memory 208, an operating system 210, a database management system 212, a Business Resilience Runtime Component 214, an application container 216 including one or more applications 218, and an I/O facility 220.

I/O facility 220 couples central processing complex 202 to I/O subsystem 204 via, for example, a dynamic switch 230. Dynamic switch 230 is coupled to a control unit 232, which is further coupled to one or more I/O devices 234, such as one or more direct access storage devices (DASD).

Processing environments 100 and/or 200 may include, in other embodiments, more, less and/or different components.

In yet another embodiment, a central processing complex 300 (FIG. 3) further includes a network service 302, which is used to couple a central processing complex 300 to a processing environment 304 via a network subsystem 306.

For example, network service 302 of central processing complex 300 is coupled to a switch 308 of network subsystem 306. Switch 308 is coupled to a switch 310 via routers 312 and firewalls 314. Switch 310 is further coupled to a network service 316 of processing environment 304.

Processing environment 304 further includes, for instance, a central processing unit 320, a memory 322, an operating system 324, and an application container 326 including one or more applications 328. In other embodiments, it can include more, less and/or different components.

Moreover, CPC 300 further includes, in one embodiment, a central processing unit 330, a memory 332, an operating system 334, a database management system 336, a Business Resilience Runtime Component 338, an application container 340 including one or more applications 342, and an I/O facility 344. It also may include more, less and/or different components.

I/O facility 344 is coupled to a dynamic switch 346 of an I/O subsystem 347. Dynamic switch 346 is further coupled to a control unit 348, which is coupled to one or more I/O devices 350.

Although examples of various environments are provided herein, these are only examples. Many variations to the above environments are possible and are considered within the scope of the present invention.

In the above-described environments, a Business Resilience Runtime Component of a Business Resilience System is included. Further details associated with a Business Resilience Runtime Component and a Business Resilience System are described with reference to FIG. 4.

In one example, a Business Resilience System 400 is a component that represents the management of recovery operations and configurations across an IT environment. Within that Business Resilience System, there is a Business Resilience Runtime Component (402) that represents the management functionality across multiple distinct Recovery Segments, and provides the service level automation and the support of creation of the recovery sequences. In addition, there are user interface (404), administration (406), installation (408) and configuration template (410) components within the Business Resilience System that enable the administrative operations that are to be performed. Each of these components is described in further detail below.

Business Resilience Runtime Component 402 includes a plurality of components of the BR System that are directly responsible for the collection of observations, creation of PSEs, policy acceptance, validation, error detection, and formulation of recovery sequences. As one example, Business Resilience Runtime Component 402 includes the following components:

-   -   1. One or more Business Resilience Managers (BRM) (412).         -   The Business Resilience Manager (BRM) is the primary             component containing logic to detect potential errors in the             IT environment, perform assessment to find resources causing             errors, and formulate recovery sequences to reestablish the             desired state for resources for all Recovery Segments that             may be impacted.         -   The Business Resilience Manager is a component of which             there can be one or more. It manages a set of Recovery             Segments, and has primary responsibility to formulate             recovery sequences. The association of which Recovery             Segments are managed by a given BRM is determined at             deployment time by the customer, with the help of deployment             time templates. BRMs are primarily responsible for             operations that relate to error handling and recovery             workflow generation, and cross RS interaction.     -   2. One or more Recovery Segments (RS) (414).         -   Recovery Segments are customer-defined groupings of IT             resources to which consistent availability policy is             assigned. In other words, a Recovery Segment acts as a             context within which resource recovery is performed. In many             cases, Recovery Segments are compositions of IT resources             that constitute logical entities, such as a middleware and             its related physical resources, or an “application” and its             related components.         -   There is no presumed granularity of a Recovery Segment.             Customers can choose to specify fine-grained Recovery             Segments, such as one for a given operating system, or a             coarser grained Recovery Segment associated with a business             process and its component parts, or even a site, as             examples.         -   Relationships between IT resources associated with a RS are             those which are part of the IT topology.         -   Recovery Segments can be nested or overlapped. In case of             overlapping Recovery Segments, there can be policy             associated with each RS, and during policy validation,             conflicting definitions are reconciled. Runtime assessment             is also used for policy tradeoff.         -   The Recovery Segment has operations which support policy             expression, validation, decomposition, and assessment of             state.         -   The number of Recovery Segments supported by a BR System can             vary, depending on customer configurations and business             needs.         -   One BRM can manage multiple Recovery Segments, but a given             RS is managed by a single BRM. Further, Recovery Segments             that share resources, or are subset/superset of other             Recovery Segments are managed by the same BRM, in this             example. Multiple BRMs can exist in the environment,             depending on performance, availability, and/or             maintainability characteristics.     -   3. Pattern System Environments (PSEs) (416).         -   Pattern System Environments (PSEs) are representations of a             customer's environment. Sets of observations are clustered             together using available mathematical tooling to generate             the PSEs. In one embodiment, the generation of a PSE is             automatic. A PSE is associated with a given RS, but a PSE             may include information that crosses RSs.         -   As one example, the representation is programmatic in that             it is contained within a structure from which information             can be added/extracted.     -   4. Quantified Recovery Goal (418).         -   A quantified recovery goal, such as a Recovery Time             Objective (RTO), is specified for each Recovery Segment that             a customer creates. If customers have multiple Pattern             System Environments (PSEs), a unique RTO for each PSE             associated with the RS may be specified.     -   5. Containment Region (CR) (420).         -   Containment Region(s) are components of the BR System which             are used at runtime to reflect the scope and impact of an             outage. A Containment Region includes, for instance,             identification for a set of impacted resources, as well as             BR specific information about the failure/degraded state, as             well as proposed recovery. CRs are associated with a set of             impacted resources, and are dynamically constructed by BR in             assessing the error.         -   The original resources reporting degraded availability, as             well as the resources related to those reporting degraded             availability, are identified as part of the Containment             Region. Impacted resources are accumulated into the topology             by traversing the IT relationships and inspecting the             attributes defined to the relationships. The Containment             Region is transitioned to an inactive state after a             successful recovery workflow has completed, and after all             information (or a selected subset in another example) about             the CR has been logged.     -   6. Redundancy Groups (RG) (422).         -   Redundancy Group(s) (422) are components of the BR System             that represent sets of logically equivalent services that             can be used as alternates when a resource experiences             failure or degradation. For example, three instances of a             database may form a redundancy group, if an application             server requires connectivity to one of the set of three, but             does not specify one specific instance.         -   There can be zero or more Redundancy Groups in a BR System.         -   Redundancy Groups also have an associated state that is             maintained in realtime, and can contribute to the definition             of what constitutes available, degraded, or unavailable             states. In addition, Redundancy Groups members are             dynamically and automatically selected by the BR System,             based on availability of the member and co-location             constraints.     -   7. BR Manager Data Table (BRMD) (424).         -   BR maintains specific internal information related to             various resources it manages and each entry in the BR             specific Management Data (BRMD) table represents such a             record of management. Entries in the BRMD represent IT             resources.     -   8. BR Manager Relationship Data Table (BRRD) (426).         -   BR maintains BR specific internal information related to the             pairings of resources it needs to interact with, and each             entry in the BR specific Relationship Data (BRRD) table             represents an instance of such a pairing. The pairing record             identifies the resources that participate in the pairing,             and resources can be any of those that appear in the BRMD             above. The BRRD includes information about the pairings,             which include operation ordering across resources, failure             and degradation impact across resources, constraint             specifications for allowable recovery actions, effect an             operation has on resource state, requirements for resource             to co-locate or anti-co-locate, and effects of preparatory             actions on resources.     -   9. BR Asynchronous Distributor (BRAD) (428).         -   The BR Asynchronous Distributor (BRAD) is used to handle             asynchronous behavior during time critical queries for             resource state and key properties, recovery, and for getting             observations back from resources for the observation log.     -   10. Observation Log (430).         -   The Observation Log captures the information that is             returned through periodic observations of the environment.             The information in the Observation Log is used by cluster             tooling to generate Pattern System Environments (PSE).     -   11. RS Activity Log (432).         -   Each RS has an activity log that represents the RS actions,             successes, failures. Activity logs are internal BR             structures. Primarily, they are used for either problem             determination purposes or at runtime, recovery of failed BR             components. For example, when the RS fails and recovers, it             reads the Activity Log to understand what was in progress at             time of failure, and what needs to be handled in terms of             residuals.     -   12. BRM Activity Log (434).         -   The BRM also has an activity log that represents BRM             actions, success, failures. Activity logs are internal BR             structures.     -   13. Transaction Table (TT) (436).         -   The transaction table is a serialization mechanism used to             house the counts of ongoing recovery and preparatory             operations. It is associated with the RS, and is referred to             as the RS TT.

In addition to the Business Resilience Runtime Component of the BR system, the BR system includes the following components, previously mentioned above.

User Interface (UI) Component (404).

-   -   The User interface component is, for instance, a graphical         environment through which the customer's IT staff can make         changes to the BR configuration. As examples: create and manage         Recovery Segments; specify recovery goals; validate         achievability of goals prior to failure time; view and alter BR         generated workflows.     -   The user interface (UI) is used as the primary interface for         configuring BR. It targets roles normally associated with a         Business Analyst, Solution Architect, System Architect, or         Enterprise Architect, as examples.     -   One purpose of the BR UI is to configure the BR resources. It         allows the user to create BR artifacts that are used for a         working BR runtime and also monitors the behaviors and         notifications of these BR resources as they run. In addition,         the BR UI allows interaction with resources in the environment         through, for instance, relationships and their surfaced         properties and operations. The user can add resources to BR to         affect recovery and behaviors of the runtime environment.     -   The BR UI also surfaces recommendations and best practices in         the form of templates. These are reusable constructs that         present a best practice to the user which can then be approved         and realized by the user.     -   Interaction with the BR UI is based on the typical editor save         lifecycle used within, for instance, the developmental tool         known as Eclipse (available and described at www.Eclipse.org).         The user typically opens or edits an existing resource, makes         modifications, and those modifications are not persisted back to         the resource until the user saves the editor.     -   Predefined window layouts in Eclipse are called perspectives.         Eclipse views and editors are displayed in accordance with the         perspective's layout, which can be customized by the user. The         BR UI provides a layout as exemplified in the screen display         depicted in FIG. 5A.     -   Screen display 500 depicted in FIG. 5A displays one example of a         Business Resilience Perspective. Starting in the upper left         corner and rotating clockwise, the user interface includes, for         instance:         -   1. Business Resilience View 502         -   This is where the user launches topologies and definition             templates for viewing and editing.         -   2. Topology/Definition Template Editor 504         -   This is where the editors are launched from the Business             Resilience View display. The user can have any number of             editors open at one time.         -   3. Properties View/Topology Resources View/Search View 506         -   The property and topology resource views are driven off the             active editor. They display information on the currently             selected resource and allow the user to modify settings             within the editor.         -   4. Outline View 508         -   This view provides a small thumbnail of the topology or             template being displayed in the editor. The user can pan             around the editor quickly by moving the thumbnail.     -   The topology is reflected by a RS, as shown in the screen         display of FIG. 5B. In FIG. 5B, a Recovery Segment 550 is         depicted, along with a list of one or more topology resources         552 of the RS (not necessarily shown in the current view of the         RS).     -   In one example, the BR UI is created on the Eclipse Rich Client         Platform (RCP), meaning it has complete control over the Eclipse         environment, window layouts, and overall behavior. This allows         BR to tailor the Eclipse platform and remove Eclipse artifacts         not directly relevant to the BR UI application, allowing the         user to remain focused, while improving usability.     -   BR extends the basic user interface of Eclipse by creating         software packages called “plugins’ that plug into the core         Eclipse platform architecture to extend its capabilities. By         implementing the UI as a set of standard Eclipse plug-ins, BR         has the flexibility to plug into Eclipse, WebSphere Integration         Developer, or Rational product installs, as examples. The UI         includes two categories of plug-ins, those that are BR specific         and those that are specific to processing resources in the IT         environment. This separation allows the resource plug-ins to be         potentially re-used by other products.     -   By building upon Eclipse, BR has the option to leverage other         tooling being developed for Eclipse. This is most apparent in         its usage of BPEL workflow tooling, but the following packages         and capabilities are also being leveraged, in one embodiment, as         well:         -   The Eclipse platform provides two graphical toolkit             packages, GEF and Draw2D, which are used by BR, in one             example, to render topology displays and handle the rather             advanced topology layouts and animations. These packages are             built into the base Eclipse platform and provide the             foundation for much of the tooling and topology user             interfaces provided by this design.         -   The Eclipse platform allows building of advanced editors and             forms, which are being leveraged for BR policy and template             editing. Much of the common support needed for editors, from             the common save lifecycle to undo and redo support, is             provided by Eclipse.         -   The Eclipse platform provides a sophisticated Welcome and             Help system, which helps introduce and helps users to get             started configuring their environment. Likewise, Eclipse             provides a pluggable capability to create task instructions,             which can be followed step-by-step by the user to accomplish             common or difficult tasks.

BR Admin Mailbox (406) (FIG. 4).

-   -   The BR Admin (or Administrative) Mailbox is a mechanism used by         various flows of the BR runtime to get requests to an         administrator to take some action. The Admin mailbox         periodically retrieves information from a table, where BR keeps         an up-to-date state.     -   As an example, the Admin Mailbox defines a mechanism where BR         can notify the user of important events needing user attention         or at least user awareness. The notifications are stored in the         BR database so they can be recorded while the UI is not running         and then shown to the user during their next session.     -   The notifications are presented to the user, in one example, in         their own Eclipse view, which is sorted by date timestamp to         bubble the most recent notifications to the top. An example of         this view is shown in FIG. 6A. As shown, a view 600 is presented         that includes messages 602 relating to resources 604. A date         timestamp 606 is also included therewith.     -   Double clicking a notification opens an editor on the         corresponding resource within the BR UI, which surfaces the         available properties and operations the user may need to handle         the notification.     -   The user is able to configure the UI to notify them whenever a         notification exceeding a certain severity is encountered. The UI         then alerts 650 the user of the notification and message when it         comes in, as shown in FIG. 6B, in one example.     -   When alerted, the user can choose to open the corresponding         resource directly. If the user selects No, the user can revisit         the message or resource by using the above notification log         view.

BR Install Logic (408) (FIG. 4).

-   -   The BR Install logic initializes the environment through         accessing the set of preconfigured template information and         vendor provided tables containing resource and relationship         information, then applying any customizations initiated by the         user.

Availability Configuration Templates (410):

-   -   Recovery Segment Templates         -   The BR System has a set of Recovery Segment templates which             represent common patterns of resources and relationships.             These are patterns matched with each individual customer             environment to produce recommendations for RS definitions to             the customer, and offer these visually for customization or             acceptance.     -   Redundancy Group Templates         -   The BR System has a set of Redundancy Group templates which             represent common patterns of forming groups of redundant             resources. These are optionally selected and pattern matched             with each individual customer environment to produce             recommendations for RG definitions to a customer.     -   BR Manager Deployment Templates         -   The BR System has a set of BR Manager Deployment templates             which represent recommended configurations for deploying the             BR Manager, its related Recovery Segments, and the related             BR management components. There are choices for distribution             or consolidation of these components. Best practice             information is combined with optimal availability and             performance characteristics to recommend a configuration,             which can then be subsequently accepted or altered by the             customer.     -   Pairing Templates         -   The BR System has a set of Pairing Templates used to             represent best practice information about which resources             are related to each other.

The user interface, admin mailbox, install logic and/or template components can be part of the same computing unit executing BR Runtime or executed on one or more other distributed computing units.

To further understand the use of some of the above components and their interrelationships, the following example is offered. This example is only offered for clarification purposes and is not meant to be limiting in any way.

Referring to FIG. 7, a Recovery Segment RS 700 is depicted. It is assumed for this Recovery Segment that:

-   -   The Recovery Segment RS has been defined associated with an         instantiated and deployed BR Manager for monitoring and         management.     -   Relationships have been established between the Recovery Segment         RS and the constituent resources 702 a-702 m.     -   A goal policy has been defined and validated for the Recovery         Segment through interactions with the BR UI.     -   The following impact pairings have been assigned to the         resources and relationships:

Rule Resource #1 State Resource #2 State 1 App-A Degraded RS Degraded 2 App-A Unavailable RS Unavailable 3 DB2 Degraded CICS Unavailable 4 CICS Unavailable App-A Unavailable 5 CICS Degraded App-A Degraded 6 OSStorage-1 Unavailable CICS Degraded 7 OSStorage-1 Unavailable Storage Copy Set Degraded 8 DB2 User & Degraded DB2 Degraded Log Data 9 OSStorage-2 Unavailable DB2 User & Degraded Log Data 10 z/OS Unavailable CICS Unavailable 11 z/OS Unavailable DB2 Unavailable 12 Storage Copy Set Degraded CICS User & Degraded Log Data 13 Storage Copy Set Degraded DB2 User & Degraded Log Data

-   -   The rules in the above table correspond to the numbers in the         figure. For instance, #12 (704) corresponds to Rule 12 above.     -   Observation mode for the resources in the Recovery Segment has         been initiated either by the customer or as a result of policy         validation.     -   The environment has been prepared as a result of that goal         policy via policy validation and the possible creation and         execution of a preparatory workflow.     -   The goal policy has been activated for monitoring by BR.

As a result of these conditions leading up to runtime, the following subscriptions have already taken place:

-   -   The BRM has subscribed to runtime state change events for the         RS.     -   RS has subscribed to state change events for the constituent         resources.

These steps highlight one example of an error detection process:

-   -   The OSStorage-1 resource 702 h fails (goes Unavailable).     -   RS gets notified of state change event.     -   1^(st) level state aggregation determines:         -   Storage Copy Set→Degraded         -   CICS User & Log Data→Degraded         -   DB2 User & Log Data→Degraded         -   DB2→Degraded         -   CICS→Unavailable         -   App-A→Unavailable     -   1^(st) level state aggregation determines:         -   RS→Unavailable     -   BRM gets notified of RS state change. Creates the following         Containment Region:

Resource Reason OSStorage-1 Unavailable Storage Copy Set Degraded CICS User & Log Data Degraded DB2 User & Log Data Degraded DB2 Degraded App-A Unavailable CICS Unavailable RS Unavailable

-   -   Creates a recovery workflow based on the following resources:

Resource State OSStorage-1 Unavailable Storage Copy Set Degraded CICS User & Log Data Degraded DB2 User & Log Data Degraded DB2 Degraded App-A Unavailable CICS Unavailable RS Unavailable

In addition to the above, BR includes a set of design points that help in the understanding of the system. These design points include, for instance:

Goal Policy Support

BR is targeted towards goal based policies—the customer configures his target availability goal, and BR determines the preparatory actions and recovery actions to achieve that goal (e.g., automatically).

Availability management of the IT infrastructure through goal based policy is introduced by this design. The BR system includes the ability to author and associate goal based availability policy with the resource Recovery Segments described herein. In addition, support is provided to decompose the goal policy into configuration settings, preparatory actions and runtime procedures in order to execute against the deployed availability goal. In one implementation of the BR system, the Recovery Time Objective (RTO—time to recover post outage) is a supported goal policy. Additional goal policies of data currency (e.g., Recovery Point Objective) and downtime maximums, as well as others, can also be implemented with the BR system. Recovery Segments provide the context for association of goal based availability policies, and are the scope for goal policy expression supported in the BR design. The BR system manages the RTO through an understanding of historical information, metrics, recovery time formulas (if available), and actions that affect the recovery time for IT resources.

RTO goals are specified by the customer at a Recovery Segment level and apportioned to the various component resources grouped within the RS. In one example, RTO goals are expressed as units of time intervals, such as seconds, minutes, and hours. Each RS can have one RTO goal per Pattern System Environment associated with the RS. Based on the metrics available from the IT resources, and based on observed history and/or data from the customer, the RTO goal associated with the RS is evaluated for achievability, taking into account which resources are able to be recovered in parallel.

Based on the RTO for the RS, a set of preparatory actions expressed as a workflow is generated. This preparatory workflow configures the environment or makes alterations in the current configuration, to achieve the RTO goal or to attempt to achieve the goal.

In terms of optimizing RTO, there are tradeoffs associated with the choices that are possible for preparatory and recovery actions. Optimization of recovery choice is performed by BR, and may include interaction at various levels of sophistication with IT resources. In some cases, BR may set specific configuration parameters that are surfaced by the IT resource to align with the stated RTO. In other cases, BR may request that an IT resource itself alter its management functions to achieve some portion of the overall RS RTO. In either case, BR aligns availability management of the IT resources contained in the RS with the stated RTO.

Metrics and Goal Association

In this design, as one example, there is an approach to collecting the required or desired metrics data, both observed and key varying factors, system profile information that is slow or non-moving, as well as potential formulas that reflect a specific resource's use of the key factors in assessing and performing recovery and preparatory actions, historical data and system information. The information and raw metrics that BR uses to perform analysis and RTO projections are expressed as part of the IT resources, as resource properties. BR specific interpretations and results of statistical analysis of key factors correlated to recovery time are kept as BR Specific Management data (BRMD).

Relationships Used by BR, and BR Specific Resource Pairing Information

BR maintains specific information about the BR management of each resource pairing or relationship between resources. Information regarding the BR specific data for a resource pairing is kept by BR, including information such as ordering of operations across resources, impact assessment information, operation effect on availability state, constraint analysis of actions to be performed, effects of preparatory actions on resources, and requirements for resources to co-locate or anti-co-locate.

Evaluation of Failure Scope

One feature of the BR function is the ability to identify the scope and impact of a failure. The BR design uses a Containment Region to identify the resources affected by an incident. The Containment Region is initially formed with a fairly tight restriction on the scope of impact, but is expanded on receiving errors related to the first incident. The impact and scope of the failure is evaluated by traversing the resource relationships, evaluating information on BR specific resource pairing information, and determining most current state of the resources impacted.

Generation and Use of Workflow

Various types of preparatory and recovery processes are formulated and in some cases, optionally initiated. Workflows used by BR are dynamically generated based on, for instance, customer requirements for RTO goal, based on actual scope of failure, and based on any configuration settings customers have set for the BR system.

A workflow includes one or more operations to be performed, such as Start CICS, etc. Each operation takes time to execute and this amount of time is learned based on execution of the workflows, based on historical data in the observation log or from customer specification of execution time for operations. The workflows formalize, in a machine readable, machine editable form, the operations to be performed.

In one example, the processes are generated into Business Process Execution Language (BPEL) compliant workflows with activities that are operations on IT resources or specified manual, human activities. For example, BRM automatically generates the workflows in BPEL. This automatic generation includes invoking routines to insert activities to build the workflow, or forming the activities and building the XML (Extensible Mark-Up Language). Since these workflows are BPEL standard compliant, they can be integrated with other BPEL defined workflows which may incorporate manual activities performed by the operations staff. These BR related workflows are categorized as follows, in one example:

-   -   Preparatory—Steps taken during the policy prepare phase in         support of a given goal, such as the setting of specific         configuration values, or the propagation of availability related         policy on finer grained resources in the Recovery Segment         composition. BR generates preparatory workflows, for instance,         dynamically. Examples of preparatory actions include setting up         storage replication, and starting additional instances of         middleware subsystems to support redundancy.     -   Recovery—Steps taken as a result of fault detection during         runtime monitoring of the environment, such as, for example,         restarting a failed operating system (OS). BR generates recovery         workflows dynamically, in one example, based on the actual         failure rather than a prespecified sequence.     -   Preventive—Steps taken to contain or fence an error condition         and prevent the situation from escalating to a more substantial         outage or impact; for example, the severing of a failed         resource's relationship instances to other resources. Preventive         workflows are also dynamically generated, in one example.     -   Return—Steps taken to restore the environment back to ‘normal         operations’ post recovery, also represented as dynamically         generated workflows, as one example.         Capturing of Workflow Information

Since the set of BR actions described above modify existing IT environments, visibility to the actions that are taken by BR prior to the actual execution is provided. To gain trust in the decisions and recommendations produced by BR, the BR System can run in ‘advisory mode’. As part of advisory mode, the possible actions that would be taken are constructed into a workflow, similar to what would be done to actually execute the processes. The workflows are then made visible through standard workflow authoring tooling for customers to inspect or modify. Examples of BPEL tooling include:

-   -   Bolie, et al., BPEL Cookbook: Best Practices for SOA-based         Integration and Composite Applications Development, ISBN         1904811337, 2006, PACKT Publishing, hereby incorporated herein         by reference in its entirety;     -   Juric, et al., Business Process Execution Language for Web         Services: BPEL and BPEL YWS, ISBN 1-904811-18-3, 2004, PACKT         Publishing, hereby incorporated herein by reference in its         entirety.     -   http://www-306.ibm.com/software/integration/wid/about/?S_CMP=rnav     -   http://www.eclipse.org/bpel/     -   http://www.parasoft.com/jsp/products/home.jsp;jessionid=aaa56iqFywA-HJ?product=BPEL&redname=googbpelm&referred=searchengine%2Fgoogle%Fbpel         Tooling Lifecycle, Support of Managed Resources and Roles

BR tooling spans the availability management lifecycle from definition of business objectives, IT resource selection, availability policy authoring and deployment, development and deployment of runtime monitors, etc. In one example, support for the following is captured in the tooling environment for the BR system:

-   -   Visual presentation of the IT resources & their relationships,         within both an operations and administration context.     -   Configuration and deployment of Recovery Segments and BRMs.     -   Authoring and deployment of a BR policy.     -   Modification of availability configuration or policy changes for         BR.     -   BPEL tooling to support viewing of BR created, as well as         customer authored, workflows.     -   BPEL tooling to support monitoring of workflow status, related         to an operations console view of IT resource operational state.         Policy Lifecycle

The policy lifecycle for BR goal policies, such as RTO goals, includes, for example:

-   -   Define—Policy is specified to a RS, but no action is taken by         the BRM to support the policy (observation information may be         obtained).     -   Validate—Policy is validated for syntax, capability, etc.;         preparatory workflow created for viewing and validation by         customer.     -   Prepare—Preparatory action workflows are optionally executed.     -   Activate—Policy is activated for runtime monitoring of the         environment.     -   Modify—Policy is changed dynamically in runtime.         Configurable State Aggregation

One of the points in determining operational state of a Recovery Segment is that this design allows for customers to configure a definition of specific ‘aggregated’ states, using properties of individual IT resources. A Recovery Segment is an availability management context, in one example, which may include a diverse set of IT resources.

The customer may provide the rules logic used within the Recovery Segment to consume the relevant IT resource properties and determine the overall state of the RS (available, degraded and unavailable, etc). The customer can develop and deploy these rules as part of the Recovery Segment availability policy. For example, if there is a database included in the Recovery Segment, along with the supporting operating system, storage, and network resources, a customer may configure one set of rules that requires that the database must have completed the recovery of in-flight work in order to consider the overall Recovery Segment available. As another example, customers may choose to configure a definition of availability based on transaction rate metrics for a database, so that if the rate falls below some value, the RS is considered unavailable or degraded, and evaluation of ‘failure’ impact will be triggered within the BR system. Using these configurations, customers can tailor both the definitions of availability, as well as the rapidity with which problems are detected, since any IT resource property can be used as input to the aggregation, not just the operational state of IT resources.

Failure During Workflow Sequences of Preparatory, Recovery, Preventive

Failures occurring during sequences of operations executed within a BPEL compliant process workflow are intended to be handled through use of BPEL declared compensation actions, associated with the workflow activities that took a failure. The BR System creates associated “undo” workflows that are then submitted to compensate, and reset the environment to a stable state, based on where in the workflow the failure occurred.

Customer Values

The following set of customer values, as examples, are derived from the BR system functions described above, listed here with supporting technologies from the BR system:

-   -   Align total IT runtime environment to business function         availability objectives:         -   RS definition from representation of IT Resources;         -   Goal (RTO) and action policy specification, validation and             activation; and         -   Tooling by Eclipse, as an example, to integrate with IT             process management.     -   Rapid, flexible, administrative level:         -   Alteration of operation escalation rules;         -   Customization of workflows for preparatory and recovery to             customer goals;         -   Customization of IT resource selection from RG based on             quality of service (QoS);         -   Alteration of definition of IT resource and business             application state (available, degraded, or unavailable);         -   Customization of aggregated state;         -   Modification of topology for RS and RG definition;         -   Selection of BR deployment configuration;         -   Alteration of IT resource recovery metrics;         -   Customization of generated Pattern System Environments; and         -   Specification of statistical tolerances required for system             environment formation or recovery metric usage.     -   Extensible framework for customer and vendor resources:         -   IT resource definitions not specific to BR System; and         -   Industry standard specification of workflows, using, for             instance, BPEL standards.     -   Adaptive to configuration changes and optimization:         -   IT resource lifecycle and relationships dynamically             maintained;         -   System event infrastructure utilized for linkage of IT             resource and BR management;         -   IT resource recovery metrics identified and collected;         -   IT resource recovery metrics used in forming Pattern System             Environments;         -   Learned recovery process effectiveness applied to successive             recovery events;         -   System provided measurement of eventing infrastructure             timing;         -   Dynamic formation of time intervals for aggregation of             related availability events to a root cause; and         -   Distribution of achieved recovery time over constituent             resources.     -   Incremental adoption and coexistence with other availability         offerings:         -   Potential conflict of multiple managers for a resource based             on IT representation;         -   Workflows for recovery and preparatory reflect operations             with meta data linked to existing operations;         -   Advisory mode execution for preparatory and recovery             workflows; and         -   Incremental inclusion of resources of multiple types.     -   Support for resource sharing:         -   Overlapping and contained RS;         -   Merger of CR across RS and escalation of failure scope; and         -   Preparatory and recovery workflows built to stringency             requirements over multiple RS.     -   Extensible formalization of best practices based on industry         standards:         -   Templates and patterns for RS and RG definition;         -   Preparatory and recovery workflows (e.g., BPEL) for             customization, adoption; and         -   Industry standard workflow specifications enabling             integration across customer and multiple vendors.     -   Integration of business resilience with normal runtime         operations and IT process automation:         -   Option to base on IT system wide, open industry standard             representation of resources;         -   BR infrastructure used for localized recovery within a             system, cluster and across sites; and         -   Utilization of common system infrastructure for events,             resource discovery, workflow processing, visualization.

Management of the IT environment is adaptively performed, as described herein and in a U.S. patent application “Adaptive Business Resiliency Computer System for Information Technology Environments,” (POU920070364US1), Bobak et al., co-filed herewith, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

Many different sequences of activities can be undertaken in creating a BR environment. The following represents one possible sequence; however, many other sequences are possible. This sequence is provided merely to facilitate an understanding of a BR system and one or more aspects of the present invention. This sequence is not meant to be limiting in any way. In the following description, reference is made to various U.S. patent applications, which are co-filed herewith.

On receiving the BR and related product offerings, an installation process is undertaken. Subsequent to installation of the products, a BR administrator may define the configuration for BR manager instances with the aid of BRM configuration templates.

Having defined the BRM configuration a next step could be to define Recovery Segments as described in “Recovery Segments for Computer Business Applications,” (POU920070108US1), Bobak et al., which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

Definition of a RS may use a representation of resources in a topology graph as described in “Use of Graphs in Managing Computing Environments,” (POU920070112US1), Bobak et al., which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

It is expected that customers will enable BR operation in “observation” mode for a period of time to gather information regarding key metrics and operation execution duration associated with resources in a RS.

At some point, sufficient observation data will have been gathered or a customer may have sufficient knowledge of the environment to be managed by BR. A series of activities may then be undertaken to prepare the RS for availability management by BR. As one example, the following steps may be performed iteratively.

A set of functionally equivalent resources may be defined as described in “Use of Redundancy Groups in Runtime Computer Management of Business Applications,” (POU920070113US1), Bobak et al., which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

Specification of the availability state for individual resources, redundancy groups and Recovery Segments may be performed as described in “Use of Multi-Level State Assessment in Computer Business Environments,” (POU920070114US1), Bobak et al., which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

Representations for the IT environment in which BR is to operate may be created from historical information captured during observation mode, as described in “Computer Pattern System Environment Supporting Business Resiliency,” (POU920070107US1), Bobak et al., which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. These definitions provide the context for understanding how long it takes to perform operations which change the configuration—especially during recovery periods.

Information on relationships between resources may be specified based on recommended best practices—expressed in templates—or based on customer knowledge of their IT environment as described in “Conditional Computer Runtime Control of an Information Technology Environment Based on Pairing Constructs,” (POU920070110US1), Bobak et al., which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Pairing processing provides the mechanism for reflecting required or desired order of execution for operations, the impact of state change for one resource on another, the effect execution of an operation is expected to have on a resource state, desire to have one subsystem located on the same system as another and the effect an operation has on preparing the environment for availability management.

With preliminary definitions in place, a next activity of the BR administrator might be to define the goals for availability of the business application represented by a Recovery Segment as described in “Programmatic Validation in an Information Technology Environment,” (POU920070111US1), Bobak et al, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

Managing the IT environment to meet availability goals includes having the BR system prioritize internal operations. The mechanism utilized to achieve the prioritization is described in “Serialization in Computer Management,” (POU920070105US1), Bobak et al., which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

Multiple operations are performed to prepare an IT environment to meet a business application's availability goal or to perform recovery when a failure occurs. The BR system creates workflows to achieve the required or desired ordering of operations, as described in “Dynamic Generation of Processes in Computing Environments,” (POU920070123US1), Bobak et al., which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

A next activity in achieving a BR environment might be execution of the ordered set of operations used to prepare the IT environment, as described in “Dynamic Selection of Actions in an Information Technology Environment,” (POU920070117US1), Bobak et al., which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

Management by BR to achieve availability goals may be initiated, which may initiate or continue monitoring of resources to detect changes in their operational state, as described in “Real-Time Information Technology Environments,” (POU920070120US1), Bobak et al., which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Monitoring of resources may have already been initiated as a result of “observation” mode processing.

Changes in resource or redundancy group state may result in impacting the availability of a business application represented by a Recovery Segment. Analysis of the environment following an error is performed. The analysis allows sufficient time for related errors to be reported, insures gathering of resource state completes in a timely manner and insures sufficient time is provided for building and executing the recovery operations—all within the recovery time goal, as described herein, in accordance with one or more aspects of the present invention.

A mechanism is provided for determining if events impacting the availability of the IT environment are related, and if so, aggregating the failures to optimally scope the outage, as described in “Management of Computer Events in a Computer Environment,” (POU920070118US1), Bobak et al., which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

Ideally, current resource state can be gathered after scoping of a failure. However, provisions are made to insure management to the availability goal is achievable in the presence of non-responsive components in the IT environment, as described in “Managing the Computer Collection of Information in an Information Technology Environment,” (POU920070121US1), Bobak et al., which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

With the outage scoped and current resource state evaluated, the BR environment can formulate an optimized recovery set of operations to meet the availability goal, as described in “Defining a Computer Recovery Process that Matches the Scope of Outage,” (POU920070124US1), Bobak et al., which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

Formulation of a recovery plan is to uphold customer specification regarding the impact recovery operations can have between different business applications, as described in “Managing Execution Within a Computing Environment,” (POU920070115US1), Bobak et al., which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

Varying levels of recovery capability exist with resources used to support a business application. Some resources possess the ability to perform detailed recovery actions while others do not. For resources capable of performing recovery operations, the BR system provides for delegation of recovery if the resource is not shared by two or more business applications, as described in “Conditional Actions Based on Runtime Conditions of a Computer System Environment,” (POU920070116US1), Bobak et al., which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

Having evaluated the outage and formulated a set of recovery operations, the BR system resumes monitoring for subsequent changes to the IT environment.

In support of mainline BR system operation, there are a number of activities including, for instance:

-   -   Coordination for administrative task that employ multiple steps,         as described in “Adaptive Computer Sequencing of Actions,”         (POU920070106US1), Bobak et al., which is hereby incorporated         herein by reference in its entirety.     -   Use of provided templates representing best practices in         defining the BR system, as described in “Defining and Using         Templates in Configuring Information Technology Environments,”         (POU920070109US1), Bobak et al., which is hereby incorporated         herein by reference in its entirety.     -   Use of provided templates in formulation of workflows, as         described in “Using Templates in a Computing Environment,”         (POU920070126US1), Bobak et al., which is hereby incorporated         herein by reference in its entirety.     -   Making changes to the availability goals while supporting         ongoing BR operation, as described in “Non-Disruptively Changing         a Computing Environment,” (POU920070122US1), Bobak et al., which         is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.     -   Making changes to the scope of a business application or         Recovery Segment, as described in “Non-Disruptively Changing         Scope of Computer Business Applications Based on Detected         Changes in Topology,” (POU920070125US1), Bobak et al., which is         hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.     -   Detecting and recovery for the BR system is performed         non-disruptively, as described in “Managing Processing of a         Computing Environment During Failures of the Environment,”         (POU920070365US1), Bobak et al., which is hereby incorporated         herein in its entirety.

In order to build a BR environment that meets recovery time objectives, IT configurations within a customer's location are to be characterized and knowledge about the duration of execution for recovery time operations within those configurations is to be gained. IT configurations and the durations for operation execution vary by time, constituent resources, quantity and quality of application invocations, as examples. Customer environments vary widely in configuration of IT resources in support of business applications. Understanding the customer environment and the duration of operations within those environments aids in insuring a Recovery Time Objective is achievable and in building workflows to alter the customer configuration of IT resources in advance of a failure and/or when a failure occurs.

A characterization of IT configurations within a customer location is built by having knowledge of the key recovery time characteristics for individual resources (i.e., the resources that are part of the IT configuration being managed; also referred to as managed resources). Utilizing the representation for a resource, a set of key recovery time objective (RTO) metrics are specified by the resource owner. During ongoing operations, the BR manager gathers values for these key RTO metrics and gathers timings for the operations that are used to alter the configuration. It is expected that customers will run the BR function in “observation” mode prior to having provided a BR policy for availability management or other management. While executing in “observation” mode, the BR manager periodically gathers RTO metrics and operation execution durations from resource representations. The key RTO metrics properties, associated values and operation execution times are recorded in an Observation log for later analysis through tooling. Key RTO metrics and operation execution timings continue to be gathered during active BR policy management in order to maintain currency and iteratively refine data used to characterize customer IT configurations and operation timings within those configurations.

Examples of RTO properties and value range information by resource type are provided in the below table. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that additional, less, and/or different resource types, properties and/or value ranges may be provided.

Resource Type Property Value Range Operating System Identifier Text State Ok, stopping, planned stop, stopped, starting, error, lost monitoring capability, unknown Memory Size Units in MB Number of systems in sysplex, if integer applicable Last IPL time of day Units in time of day/clock Type of last IPL Cold, warm, emergency Total Real Storage Available Units in MB GRS Star Mode Yes or No Complete IPL time to reach Units of elapsed time ‘available’ Total CPU using to reach Units of elapsed time available during IPL Total CPU delay to reach Units of elapsed time available during IPL Total Memory using to reach Units in MB available during IPL Total Memory delay to reach Units of elapsed time available during IPL Total i/o requests Integer value, number of requests Total i/o using to reach available Units of elapsed time during IPL Total i/o delay to reach available Units of elapsed time during IPL Computer System (LPAR, Identifier Text Server, etc.) State Ok, stopping, stopped, planned down, starting, error, lost monitoring capability, unknown Type of CPU - model, type, Text value serial Number of CPUs integer Number of shared processors integer Number of dedicated processors integer Last Activate Time of Day Units in time of day/clock Network Components Group of Network Connections Identity Operational State Ok, Starting, Disconnected, Stopping, Degraded, Unknown State of each associated Network Text Application Connection Performance Stats on loss and Complex delays Recovery Time for any Units in elapsed time associated application network connections Number of active application Integer network connections associated at time of network problem Stopped Time/duration for Units in elapsed time group of connectoins Maximum Network Recovery Units in elapsed time Time for any application connection in group Maximum Number of active Integer connections at time of network problem encountered, for any application connection in group Maximum Number of Integer connections processed at time of network recovery, for the group of connections Maximum network connection Units in elapsed time recovery time/duration for any application connection in the group Maximum Number of Integer connections dropped at time of application network connection recovery, for any application connection in the group Network Application Connection Identity Text State Ok, Stopping, Degraded, Error, Unknown Configuration Settings Complex Associated TCP/IP Parameter Text Settings Requirement Policies QoS or BR policies Performance Statistics, rules, Complex service class, number of active Network OS services State update Interval Units of elapsed time Last restart time of day Units in time of day/clock Last Restart Time/Duration Units in elapsed time Network Recovery Time for app Units in elapsed time connection Number of active connections at Integer time of network problem encountered, on a per app connection basis Number of connections Integer processed at time of network recovery, for the app connection application network connection Units in elapsed time recovery time/duration Number of connections at time of Integer application network connection problem encountered Number of connections Integer processed at time of application network connection recovery Number of connections dropped Integer at time of application network connection recovery Network Host Connection Identity Text State Ok, Stopping, Degraded, Error, Unknown Configuration Settings Complex Associated TCP/IP Parameter Text Settings Requirement Policies QoS or BR policies Performance Statistics, rules, Complex service class, number of active Network OS services State update Interval Units of elapsed time Last restart time of day Units in time of day/clock Last Restart Time/Duration Units in elapsed time Number of QoS Events, Integer indicating potential degradation Number of QoS Events handled, Integer Last handled QoS Event Text Database Subsystem Name, identifier Text Operational State Operational, Nonoperational, starting, stopping, in recovery, log suspended, backup initiated, restore initiated, restore complete, in checkpoint, checkpoint completed, applying log, backing out inflights, resolving indoubts, planned termination, lost monitoring capability Time spent in log apply Units of elapsed time Time spent during inflight Units of elapsed time processing Time spent during indoubt Units of elapsed time processing Total time to restart Units of elapsed time Checkpoint frequency Units of time Backout Duration Number of records to read back in log during restart processing CPU Used during Restart Units of elapsed time CPU Delay during Restart Units of elapsed time Memory Used during Restart Units in MB Memory Delay during Restart Units of elapsed time I/O Requests during restart Integer value of number of requests I/O using during restart Units of elapsed time I/O Delay during restart Units of elapsed time Database Datasharing Group Identifer Text Operational State Operational, nonoperational, degraded (some subset of members non operational), lost monitoring capability Number of locks in Shared Integer value Facility Time spent in lock cleanup for Elapsed time value last restart Database Identifier Text Tablespace Identifier Text Transaction Region Identifier Text Name Text Associated job name Text Maximum number of tasks/ Integer value threads Restart type for next restart Warm, cold, emergency Forward log name Text System log name Text Operational State Operational, nonoperational, in recovery, starting, stop normal first quiesce, stop normal second quiesce, stop normal third quiesce Time spent in log apply Units of elapsed time Time during each recovery stage Units of elapsed time Total time to restart Units of elapsed time CPU Used during Restart Units of elapsed time CPU Delay during Restart Units of elapsed time Memory Used during Restart Units in MB Memory Delay during Restart Units of elapsed time I/O Requests during restart Integer value of number of requests I/O connect time during restart Units of elapsed time I/O Delay during restart Units of elapsed time System Logsize Units in MB Forward Logsize Units in MB Activity Keypoint frequency Integer - number of writes before activity checkpoint taken Average Transaction Rate for Number of transactions per this region second, on average Transaction Group Group name Text Transaction Region File Filename Text Region Name Text Dataset Name Text Operational State Operational/enabled, nonoperational/disabled Open status Open, closed, closing Transaction Identifier Text Operational State Running, failed, shunted, retry in progress Region Name (s) that can run this Text transaction Program Name Text Logical Replication Group of Identity Text related datasets State Required currency characteristics Complex for datasets Required consistency Complex characteristics for datasets Replication Group Identity State Replication Session Identity State Established, in progress replication, replication successful complete Type of Session Flash copy, metro mirror, etc. Duration of last replication Units in elapsed time Time of Day for last replication Units in time of day/clock Amount of data replicated at last Units in MB replication Roleset Identity Text State CopySet Identity Text State Dataset Identity Text State Open, Closed Storage Group Identity Text State Storage Volume Identity Text State Online, offline, boxed, unknown Logical Storage Subsystem Identity Text State Storage Subsystem Identity Text State Subsystem I/O Velocity - ratio of time channels are being used Replication Link (Logical) Identity Text between Logical Subsystems State Operational, nonoperational, degraded redundancy Number of configured pipes Integer Number of operational pipes Integer

A specific example of key RTO properties for a z/OS® image is depicted in FIG. 8A. As shown, for a z/OS® image 800, the following properties are identified: GRS mode 802, CLPA? (i.e., Was the link pack area page space initialized?) 804, I/O bytes moved 806, real memory size 808, # CPs 810, CPU speed 812, and CPU delay 814, as examples.

The z/OS® image has a set of RTO metrics associated therewith, as described above. Other resources may also have its own set of metrics. An example of this is depicted in FIG. 8B, in which a Recovery Segment 820 is shown that includes a plurality of resources 822 a-m, each having its own set of metrics 824 a-m, as indicated by the shading.

Further, in one example, the RTO properties from each of the resources that are part of the Recovery Segment for App A have been gathered by BR and formed into an “observation” for recording to the Observation log, as depicted at 850.

Resources have varying degrees of functionality to support RTO goal policy. Such capacity is evaluated by BR, and expressed in resource property RTOGoalCapability in the BRMD entry for the resource. Two options for BR to receive information operation execution timings are: use of historical data or use of explicitly customer configured data. If BR relies on historical data to make recovery time projections, then before a statistically meaningful set of data is collected, this resource is not capable of supporting goal policy. A mix of resources can appear in a given RS—some have a set of observations that allow classification of the operation execution times, and others are explicitly configured by the customer.

Calculation of projected recovery time can be accomplished in two ways, depending on customer choice: use of historical observations or use of customers input timings. The following is an example of values for the RTOGoalCapability metadata that is found in the BRMD entry for the resource that indicates this choice:

UseHistoricalObservations The resource has a collection of statistically meaningful observations of recovery time, where definition of ‘statistically valid’ is provided on a resource basis, as default by BR, but tailorable by customers UseCustomerInputTimings The customer can explicitly set the operation timings for a resource

If the customer is in observation mode, then historical information is captured, regardless of whether the customer has indicated use of explicitly input timings or use of historical information.

The administrator can alter, on a resource basis, which set of timings BR is to use. The default is to use historical observations. In particular, a change source of resource timing logic is provided that alters the source that BR uses to retrieve resource timings. The two options for retrieving timings are from observed histories or explicitly from admin defined times for operation execution. The default uses information from the observed histories, gathered from periodic polls. If the customer defines times explicitly, the customer can direct BR to use those times for a given resource. If activated, observation mode continues and captures information, as well as running averages, and standard deviations. The impact to this logic is to alter the source of information for policy validation and formulation of recovery plan.

With respect to the historical observations, there may be a statistically meaningful set of observations to verify. The sample size should be large enough so that a time range for each operation execution can be calculated, with a sufficient confidence interval. The acceptable number of observations to qualify as statistically meaningful, and the desired confidence interval are customer configurable using BR UI, but provided as defaults in the BRMD entry for the resource. The default confidence interval is 95%, in one example.

There are metrics from a resource that are employed by BR to enable and perform goal management. These include, for instance:

Metric Qualification Last observed In milliseconds; recovery/restart time or alternately specifying units to use in calculations The key factors and associated Captured at last observed recovery values of the resource that affect time, and capturable at a point in recovery time time by BR The key factors and associated Captured at last observed recovery values of the resource that affect time, and capturable at a point in other dependent resources' time by BR recovery times Observed time interval If there are various points in the from ‘start’state to resource recovery lifecycle at each ‘non-blocking’ state which it becomes non-blocking to other resources which depend upon it, then: Observed time interval from ‘start’ state to each ‘non-blocking’ state Resource Consumption If the resource can provide Information information about its consumption, or the consumption of dependent resources, on an interval basis, then BR will use this information in forming PSEs and classifying timings. One example of this is: cpu, i/o, memory usage information that is available from zOS WLM for an aggregation of processes/address spaces over a given interval.

There is also a set of information about the resource that is employed—this information is provided as defaults in the BRMD entry for the resource, but provided to the BR team in the form of best practices information/defaults by the domain owners:

-   -   The operational state of the resource at which the observed         recovery time interval started.     -   The operational state of the resource at which the observed         recovery time interval ended.     -   The operational states of the resource at which point it can         unblock dependent resources (example: operational states at         which a DB2 could unblock new work from CICS, at which it could         allow processing of logs for transactions ongoing at time of         failure . . . ).     -   Values of statistical thresholds to indicate sufficient         observations for goal managing the resource (number of         observations, max standard deviations, confidence level).

In addition to the resources defined herein as part of the IT configuration that is managed, there are other resources, referred to herein as assessed resources. Assessed resources are present primarily to provide observation data for PSE formation, and to understand impact(s) on managed resources. They do not have a decomposed RTO associated with them nor are they acted on for availability by BR. Assessed resources have the following characteristics, as examples:

-   -   Are present to collect observation data for PSE formation.     -   Are present to understand impacts on managed resources.     -   No decomposed RTO is associated with an assessed resource.     -   They are resources on which resources managed by BR depend upon,         but are not directly acted on for availability by BR.     -   They are resources removed (or not explicitly added) from the         actively monitored set of resources by the BR admin during RS         definition.     -   They are resources that BR does not try to recover and BR thus         will not invoke any preparatory or recovery operations on them.

Similarly, there are likely scenarios where a resource exists in a customer environment that already has an alternative availability management solution, and does not require BR for its availability. However, since other resources that are managed by BR may be dependent on them, they are observed and assessed in order to collect observation data and understand their impacts on managed resources. Additionally, there may be resources that do not have alternative management solutions, but the customer simply does not want them managed by BR, but other managed resources are dependent upon them. They too are classified as assessed resources.

These assessed resources share many of the same characteristics of managed resources, such as, for example:

-   -   They have an entry in the BRMD, depending on their use, and the         BRMD entry has an indication of assessed vs. managed.     -   The RS subscribes to state change notifications for assessed         resources (and possibly other notifiable properties).     -   Relationships between observed and managed resources are         possible (and likely).     -   BR monitors for lifecycle events on assessed resources in the         same manner as for managed resources.     -   Assessed resources can be added and/or removed from Recovery         Segments.     -   They can be used to contribute to the aggregated state of an RS.

Finally, there are a few restrictions that BR imposes upon assessed resources, in this embodiment:

-   -   Again, BR does not invoke any workflow operations on assessed         resources.     -   A resource that is shared between two Recovery Segments is not         categorized as an assessed resource in one RS and a managed         resource in the other. It is one or the other in the RS's, but         not both.

To facilitate the building of the customer's IT configuration, observations regarding the customer's environment are gathered and stored in an observation log. In particular, the observation log is used to store observations gathered during runtime in customer environments, where each observation is a collection of various data points. They are created for each of the Recovery Segments that are in “observation” mode. These observations are used for numerous runtime and administrative purposes in the BR environment. As examples the observations are used:

-   -   To perform statistical analysis from the BR UI to form         characterizations of customers' normal execution environments,         represented in BR as Pattern System Environments (PSE).     -   To classify operations on resources into these PSEs for purposes         of determining operation execution duration.     -   Help determine approximate path length of operations that are         pushed down from BR to the resources, and possibly to the         underlying instrumentation of each resource.     -   Help determine approximate path length of activities executed         within BPEL workflows.     -   Finally, the data collected via the observation is also used to         update the metadata associated with the resource (i.e., in the         BRMD table) where appropriate.

BR gathers observations during runtime when “observation mode” is enabled at the Recovery Segment level. There are two means for enabling observation mode, as examples:

-   -   1. The BR UI allows the administrator to enable observation mode         at a Recovery Segment, which will change its “ObservationMode”         resource property to “True”, and to set the polling interval         (default=15 minutes). The Recovery Segment is defined in order         to allow observation mode, but a policy does not have to be         defined or activated for it.     -   2. Once a policy is defined though and subsequently activated,         observation mode is set for the Recovery Segment (due to the         data being used in managing and monitoring the customer's         environment). Thus, it is set automatically at policy         activation, if not already set explicitly by the administrator         (see 1 above) using the default polling interval (15 minutes).

The administrator may also disable observation mode for a Recovery Segment, which stops it from polling for data and creating subsequent observation records for insertion in the log. However, the accumulated observation log is not deleted. In one example, an RS remains in observation mode throughout its lifecycle. The UI displays the implications of disabling observation mode.

In BR, the observations that are collected by BR during runtime can be grouped into two categories, as examples:

-   -   1. Periodic poll.     -   2. Workflow (includes workflow begin/end, and workflow activity         begin/end).

A periodic poll observation is a point-in-time snapshot of the constituent resources in a Recovery Segment. Observation data points are collected for those resources in the Recovery Segment(s) which have associated BR management data for any of the following reasons, as examples:

-   -   1. Resource has RTO properties.     -   2. Resource has operations.     -   3. Resource participates in the aggregated state for the         Recovery Segment, in which it is contained.     -   4. Resource participates in any of the six types of pairing         rules.

The full value of these observations is derived for an RS when they include data that has been gathered for its constituent resources, plus the resources that those are dependent upon. In one embodiment, the administrator is not forced to include all dependent resources when defining a Recovery Segment, and even if that were the case, there is nothing that prevents them from deleting various dependent resources. When defining a Recovery Segment, the BR UI provides an option that allows the customer to display the dependency graph for those resources already in the Recovery Segment. This displays the topology from the seed node(s) in the Recovery Segment down to and including the dependent leaf nodes. The purpose of this capability is to give the customer the opportunity to display the dependent nodes and recommend that they be included in the Recovery Segment.

Preparatory and recovery workflows are built by the BR manager to achieve the customer requested RTO policy based on resource operations timings. During active policy monitoring by the BR manager, measurements of achieved time for operations are recorded in observations to the log and used to maintain the running statistical data on operation execution times. Observations written to the log may vary in the contained resource RTO metrics and operation execution timings.

Observations are also collected from any of the BPEL workflows created by BR in the customer's environment. There is a standard template that each BR BPEL workflow uses. As part of that template, observation data is captured at the start of, during, and at the completion of each workflow. Specifically, in one example, one observation is created at the end of the workflow with data accumulated from completion of each activity. This information is used to gather timings for workflow execution for use in creating subsequent workflows at time of failure.

In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, management of a customer's IT environment is facilitated by correlating events that occur within the environment, obtaining information relating to those events, and performing actions, such as environment tuning or recovery actions, based on the information. Discrete phases of processing are used to obtain the information and/or perform the actions. One or more of these discrete processing phases have tunable time intervals associated therewith. For example, at least one time interval is dynamically adjusted based on the runtime state of the environment.

One data structure that is used during correlation processing is a Containment Region. A Containment Region (CR) is used at runtime to reflect the scope and impact of an event, such as an outage. A Containment Region includes a set of impacted resources and BR specific information about the failure/degraded state of a resource, as well as a proposed recovery. A CR is a BR internal structure. The original resources reporting degraded availability, as well as the resources related to those reporting degraded availability, are identified as part of the Containment Region.

In one example, the Containment Region is implemented as one or more DB2 tables in the Business Resilience datastore that physically resides in the BR environment. That database is created at installation time, and a Containment Region is created and initialized (if necessary) at that time. The CR is associated with a particular BRM, but is not used to persist any BRM resource properties. The typical access mechanism is, for instance, via JDBC calls from the BR UI client(s) and the BR manager using JDBC type 4 drivers.

One example of a physical model of a Containment Region is depicted in FIG. 9. In one example, a Containment Region 900 includes a Containment Region table 901, a Reason_For_Inclusion table 902, a Pairings_Used table 904, a States table 906, and a Brad_List table 908, each of which is described below.

Containment_Region table 901 includes the singleton values associated with the CR. One example of the fields of this table is described below.

Data Field Data Type Description Keys CR_ID Integer Generated integer key for Primary uniqueness via a DB2 sequence. Note all primary keys in the BR database will be a generated integer for compatibility with other non-DB2 databases. DISPLAY_NAME Varchar(96) Name if entered from the BR UI. User Display_Name uniqueness for CRs will be enforced by the UI. Progress Integer The index into the array of progress indicators for the CR. For example. 1. T1→T2 2. T2→T3 3. T3→T4 4. T4→T5 5. Free 6. Inuse 7. Etc. FirstEventTod Timestamp Timestamp of the first event that caused the creation of this CR (for use in the sliding window technique). MostCurrentEventTOD Timestamp Timestamp of the most current event that caused an addition to this CR. CRQUState Integer The index into the array of states for the asynchronous query build function. For example: 1. Initial 2. Finished 3. InProcess 4. Etc. CRQBTOD Timestamp Timestamp used to place a request for resource data from the BRAD(s). T2Interval Time Time interval from the first event to T2 (used in the CR sliding window technique). T3Interval Time Time interval from the first event to T3 (used in the CR sliding window technique). T2TimerActive Char(1) Flag used in the CR sliding window technique to indicate that the T2 timer is active. T3TimerActive Char(1) Flag used in the CR sliding window technique to indicate that the T3 timer is active. ToBeEnded Char(1) Flag to indicate this CR is to be eliminated (since a merge has happened and another CR was chosen instead of this CR). PREVENTIVE_WF_ID Integer Key into the workflow table. RECOVERY_WF_ID Integer Key into the workflow table. TS_UPDATE Timestamp Timestamp of initial create or last update and defaults to current timestamp.

Related to the Containment_Region table is Reason_For_Inclusion table 902 that includes the reasons that a specific resource is under evaluation as potentially impacted, implicated or perpetrating by the outage event represented by CR. In one example, Reason_For_Inclusion table 902 includes the following fields:

Data Field Data Type Description Keys REASON_ID Integer Generated integer key for Primary uniqueness via a DB2 sequence. Note all primary keys in the BR database will be a generated integer for compatibility with other non-DB2 databases. STATES_ID Integer Foreign key from the States Foreign table that can be used to retrieve the list of reasons that a resource is in the Impacted_Resource table. Reason Integer The index into the array of possible reasons. For example: 1. Primary 2. Implicated 3. Question perpetration 4. Etc. TS_UPDATE Timestamp Timestamp of initial create or last update and defaults to current timestamp.

Pairings_Used table 904 includes the pairings that caused a resource to be in the impacted resource list. In one example, it includes the following:

Data Field Data Type Description Keys PAIRINGS_ Integer Generated integer key Primary USED_ID for uniqueness via a DB2 sequence. Note all primary keys in the BR database will be a generated integer for compatibility with other non-DB2 databases. CR_ID Integer Foreign key from the Foreign Containment Region table that can be used to retrieve the list of pairings used in the formulation of the CR. RESOURCE1_ID Char(32) ID of the first resource in the pairing. RESOURCE2_ID Char(32) ID of the second resource in the pairing. TS_UPDATE Timestamp Timestamp of initial create or last update and defaults to current timestamp.

Additionally, States table 906 includes the states of each resource associated with the CR. In one example, this table includes:

Data Field Data Type Description Keys STATES_ID Integer Generated integer key for Primary uniqueness via a DB2 sequence. Note all primary keys in the BR database will be a generated integer for compatibility with other non- DB2 databases. CR_ID Integer Foreign key from the Foreign Containment Region table that can be used to retrieve the list of states for the CR. RESOURCE_ID Char(32) Resource ID. STATE Integer The index into the array of possible states. For example: 1. Available 2. Unavailable 3. Degraded 4. Etc. TS_UPDATE Timestamp Timestamp of initial create or last update and defaults to current timestamp.

Further, Brad_List table 908 includes the BRADs being targeted for a request for resource data. In one example, this table includes:

Data Field Data Type Description Keys BRAD_LIST_ID Integer Generated integer key for Primary uniqueness via a DB2 sequence. Note all primary keys in the BR database will be a generated integer for compatibility with other non-DB2 databases. CR_ID Integer Foreign key from the Foreign Containment Region table that can be used to retrieve the list of BRAD(s) being targeted for a request for resource data BRAD_ID Integer The key into the BRAD table that identifies the BRAD proper TS_UPDATE Timestamp Timestamp of initial create or last update and defaults to current timestamp

The BR manager maintains data associated with CR processing. As part of the BR_Manager table, data is maintained for the following, as examples:

-   -   Total number of times a CR has been built.     -   Running average of CR build time.     -   Standard deviation for CR build time.

The use of the CR during processing is described in further detail below. However, prior to describing the specifics associated with the CR and correlation processing, the problems to be addressed by the processing and various objectives to be achieved are described.

Timing Framework for Processing Events—Objectives

Outages of resources in enterprise IT customer environments are rarely seen in isolation, as it is typical for a large number and wide variety of resources, including servers, storage, networks, operating systems and middleware, to operate in conjunction to meet the needs of business applications. However, current availability offerings do not recognize the relationships among resources; they react to individual outage events out of context of related failures; they have no heuristic means for determining how long it may take for related outages to be reported; and they have no means for bounding processing, as there is no understanding of recovery time objectives for the business application as a whole.

Customers and some vendors attempt to provide a layer of software on top of basic product deliverables to achieve a broader scope of availability management than provided by individual products. However, these also fall short of customer requirements, as there is no extensible framework for including new resources, no formal expression of impact one resource can have on another, and no means to recognize related outage events. As a result, customers face a wide variety of difficulties including, for instance:

-   -   High cost to perform outage analysis and root cause         determination;     -   Coarse grain recovery for a broader scope of resources than         often are impacted;     -   A broader set of resources can be impacted by recovery than         necessary or effected by a failure;     -   Individualized, tailored solutions consuming large quantities of         scarce skill resources;     -   Inflexible structures which cannot adapt to changes in the         runtime IT configuration or changes in application         characteristics over the business calendar;     -   Lack of accountable recovery against service level agreements;         and     -   Hand-crafted solutions based on messages which may change,         events which are inconsistent, and automation which invokes         commands that must be coordinated across different products         having no common semantic expression for an individual resource         or operation on a resource.         Timing Framework

The above deficiencies are overcome by the processing of events performed by BR. As one example, the processing is described with reference to the occurrence of errors. However, other types of events may be similarly handled.

BR processing of errors is based on incoming state change notification for one or more resources. Each operational state change is evaluated for whether a new Containment Region (CR), or situation is to be created, or whether the error is for a resource that already has an association or pairing with some other impacted resource. BR maintains a balance between the one extreme of reacting too quickly to a failure notification and creating a separate CR for every failing resource, and the other extreme of waiting so long as to jeopardize the RTO of the various Recovery Segments involved and/or impacted by the failure. BR accomplishes this with the concept of an event correlation or timing framework. The predicates behind the design of the event correlation framework design are that there will very likely be multiple and associated errors received as part of a failure and, that if BR can delay long enough to correlate events of the failure, it will have collected the largest possible set of impacted and related resources, and yet subsequently, build the fewest, but most efficient recovery processes, possible for that failure.

Within the event correlation framework, BR aggregates/correlates related event (e.g., error) conditions. The window of wait time is dynamic, and built on the general time for communication with the resource during normal communication. Once the errors are accumulated into a given CR, additionally impacted resources are identified. The entire set is assessed for state, asynchronously, to ensure that BR makes decisions with the most current state available from a resource. Once the state is assessed, failed and degraded impacts are inspected to form a recovery process.

The timing framework includes discrete steps or phases (e.g., five) each of which may vary in duration. Techniques for adjusting the duration of time for each phase utilize real-time data regarding the IT configuration, event notification of changes in the configuration, heuristic assessment of timing for event delivery, and data on processing time for creation and execution of a recovery set of operations, as examples.

Exemplary features of the timing framework include:

-   -   Formalization of a timeline for error detection, association and         processing with multiple discrete points (e.g., five);     -   Setting an interval to delay for accumulation of failures         related to initial failure;     -   Setting an interval over which accumulation of resource state         for event correlation can occur and still meet recovery time         objectives (RTO);     -   Real-time adjustment of intervals for failure event delivery and         resource state retrieval;     -   Dynamic adjustment of intervals based on, for instance, average         time to gather resource state, average time to build recovery         workflow, and average times for recovery times—used to insure         RTO continues to be met;     -   Customer adjustment of intervals.

The first event of a failure resulting from the state change on the Recovery Segment ensures the creation of a new CR. For each subsequent event, while the Recovery Segment is in a state that is not “Available”, the event flows (e.g., immediately) to the BRM, which decides whether to create a new CR for the resource associated with that event, or whether to merge the resource into an existing CR.

BR does not initiate recovery processing upon receiving the first event, but tries to delay in an attempt to determine if there are related failures. The delay is bounded by the use of a “sliding window”, since BR can determine how long processing can wait based on a goal, such as the RTO. Intervals are established from information that is dynamic in the customer environment, and can further vary depending on past history of build times for CRs. Processing for event correlation is controlled by the customer specified RTO and by, for example, two intervals which determine when gathering of current resource state should begin and when aggregation of errors is to end. The sliding window is, for instance, a timeline, that continuously adjusts as each new failure event or each new resource is added to the Containment Region. The sliding window timeline includes discrete points in time and intervals.

One example of a sliding window timeline 1000 is described with reference to FIG. 10A. As shown, the timeline includes a plurality of discrete points including, for example: T1: 1st event trigger 1002; T2: CR evaluation, build 1004; T3: recovery process build initialization, window close 1006; T4: recovery process start execution 1008; and T5: recovery process end execution 1010. There are also a plurality of intervals, including, for instance, interval T1→T2 1012; interval T2→T3 1014; interval T3→T4 1016; interval T4→T5 1018; and interval T1→T5 1020. Further details regarding the timeline are described below.

Sliding Window Timeline

From the time a first event (e.g., error) is reported to when BR begins gathering current state from impacted resources is termed interval T1→T2 with the point in time when BR begins gathering current state termed T2. The point in time from first reported event to when BR stops accumulating potentially related information (e.g., errors) for analysis is termed T3. BR provides two techniques for determining T2 and T3. The default technique sets T2 at the average time required to gather query responses from all resources in the RS plus two standard deviations. By default, T3 is set to the maximum time any resource in the RS takes to respond to a query for state. An optional dynamic technique sets T2 and T3 based on the average time to gather state from all resources in the RS, the average time to build a recovery process for the RS and the projected time for execution of recovery operations included in the CR. A third option enables customers to specify T2 and T3 as either fixed time intervals or time intervals calculated from simple arithmetic operations on the average and standard deviation of resource response to query time.

Further details regarding discrete phases T1-T5 are described below.

-   -   T1 is the point in time of the first event (e.g., failure event)         in the current sequence that triggered the creation of a         Containment Region.     -   T2 interval, which is adjustable, is the time from the first         reported event (e.g., error) to the time that BR is to start         collecting current state from the impacted resources for         analysis of the set of related failures. BR explicitly gathers         state from the impacted set of resources to ensure their value         for state is more recent than the last event received. By         default, T2 interval is initialized from the average time         required to gather state query responses from all resources in         the RS plus two standard deviations. The statistics on average,         standard deviation and maximum time for resource state query are         maintained by BR based on ongoing, periodic polling for resource         information. BR measures time intervals for making queries of         resource state. By using measurements of resource state query,         BR adjusts to the customer configuration and the level of         utilization of IT resources. By being based on the average         response to resource query, the default T2 interval and T3         interval are dynamically calculated based on a history of event         delivery delays experienced in the customer's normal,         pre-failure environment. Using resource state query response         times that reflect the customer environment at time of error         assists BR in determining the set of related events for analysis         (e.g., failure analysis).     -   Once the T2 interval is expired and the T2 point in time         reached, and BR detects that most failed resources are likely to         have reported a failure, BR explicitly gathers state from the         impacted set of resources to ensure their value for state is         more recent than the last event received. The state information         is to be verified explicitly since the eventing mechanisms may         have an unbounded delay. Further, in one embodiment, the         information is not queried synchronously, since gathering state         is performed in a time critical path, and queries that do not         show a response are terminated in a time interval aligned with         achieving the required RTO. In one implementation, these state         queries are accomplished with the BR Asynchronous Distributor         (BRAD).     -   T3 is referred to as the point in time when the sliding window         has closed. By default, T3 interval is initialized based on the         maximum time that any resource in any RS affected by the outage         takes to respond to a query for state. Customers may choose the         BR provided technique which sets T3 interval based on historical         information on gathering resource state information, time to         generate the recovery process and time for recovery operations         to execute. Customers may alternatively choose to specify T3         interval based on average time and maximum time required to         gather resource state. In one example (e.g., dynamic technique         described herein), the average time to gather state for         resources impacted by an outage is maintained by BR. This         average (referred to herein as avg23) is used to determine the         spacing of the interval between T2 and T3 in the dynamic         technique. T3 is the point in time that the creation of the         recovery process begins.     -   Once the T3 time interval expires for any CR, the sliding window         for that CR is closed to incoming errors, and the resources for         any other errors go into the formation of a new CR. If event         notification is received for resources related to a CR in the         process of gathering resource state and property data, that         event will be incorporated into the CR it is related to, and         processing to gather resource state and property data         reinitiates. As a result, multiple queries for resource state         and property value may be concurrently in process for a CR.         Processing is coordinated for initiating query requests and         receiving query responses to insure the most current resource         state and property values are utilized in evaluating the         failure.     -   T4 is the point in time that the recovery process begins         execution.     -   T5 is the point in time that the recovery process is projected         to end based on operation execution duration timings. It should         end, in one embodiment, prior to the RTO of the impacted         Recovery Segment(s).

The timing framework for event correlation is established and altered over the T1→T5 interval. Initial values for T1→T2 and T2→T3 are established when a new CR is formed. Times T1→T2 and T2→T3 are adjusted, if subsequent failure events are related to a previously formed CR. Recognition of related failures may occur as a result of a new failure event being received or as the result of gathering state information from resources (e.g., using an AsynchQueryBuild routine, described below). For instance, as shown in FIG. 10B, at each new event E (1030), as new resources are added to the Containment Region, the T2 point in time is adjusted (1032) to account for the state query of those new resources.

The timing framework, when initially formed, sets timers to expire at T2 and T3. In particular, timers are established for the expiration of the T1→T2 interval and the T2→T3 interval. Further details regarding T2 and T3 interval expiration are described below.

T2 Expiration

An interval timer is established initially when a new CR is created. Adjustments to the interval may be made as subsequent events occur which are related. Adjustments to the timer may also be made when responses to resource state are received that add to the set of resources impacted and included in the CR. When the T2 interval timer expires, the AsynchQueryBuild routine is invoked. Processing also updates the status of the CR to indicate it is in the T2 to T3 phase of processing.

The T2 timer may be cancelled if during event processing or response to resource state processing it is determined that the current time is later than when the T2 timer was to expire. T2 timer intervals of CR(s) which are ended during CR processing are also cancelled.

T3 Expiration

The interval timer for expiration of the T3 interval gives control to a CloseSlidingWindow routine, described herein. The CR progress is updated to reflect processing being in the T3→T4 phase. If responses to all queries for resource status subsequent to the most recent event notification related to the CR have not been received, control is passed to processing which substitutes cached resource state and property values for missing resource status responses. Otherwise, control is passed to processing to formulate the recovery process.

The T3 timer may be cancelled if during event processing or response to resource state processing it is determined that the current time is later than when the T3 timer was to expire. T3 timer intervals of CR(s) which are ended during CR processing are also cancelled.

Establishing Time Intervals

There are, for example, three techniques available for establishing the time intervals in the timing framework:

-   -   1. The default routine (a.k.a., fixed routine) uses historical         timings for receiving responses to periodic polling for resource         data, which is maintained as a running set of statistics on         average response time, standard deviation of average response         time and maximum event response time for any resource in the RS.         Retrieval of resource status may be achieved in a variety of         ways including: direct message passing requesting data from a         service provided by the resource; monitoring of events published         by the resource as may be done using SNMP (Simple Network         Management Protocol) or CIM (Common Information Model);         monitoring messages produced by the resource for notification to         operational staff; notification provided through notification         services or protocols, etc. However resource state is obtained,         a characteristic of the technique that is employed is that the         timing for receiving event status be monitored, and that a         similar mechanism be used to notify the BRM of resource outage         as is used to monitor for resource state change.     -   2. A second way of establishing timing intervals for the         framework is through direct customer specification of T2 and T3         times, which are based on historical information on average         response time, standard deviation of average response time and         maximum event response time for any resource in the RS.     -   3. A dynamic technique is provided as a third option which         utilizes statistics regarding the time to form the recovery         process (average and standard deviation) and estimates recovery         process execution duration based on operations that are required         to recover the failed environment.     -   In particular, the dynamic technique establishes T2 and T3         intervals based on, for instance, the projected recovery time,         the specified RTO, average time to gather resource state and         average time to build a recovery process.

Processing in the time interval from T2 to T3 is managed by the AsynchQueryBuild technique. A query for data on resources included in the CR is initiated and responses to query requests are processed as they are received. If, during this asynchronous build process, the BRM detects that there are overlapping resources in multiple CRs, which indicates that errors have been detected that impact related resources, the two CRs are merged into a single CR. Each time resources are added to the CR after the initial query for resource data, a new request for resource data is initiated for each resource in the CR. The AsynchQueryBuild process determines the most current response when multiple query requests are initiated.

The AsynchQueryBuild processing phase of the timing network ends when the T3 time interval expires with a timer driven event. It may also be detected as ended when processing responds to query requests by comparing the current time of response processing to the established T3 interval. When ended, it may be true that not all requests for resource data have received a response. For any missing responses for resource data, the previously cached resource data from the most recent periodic poll interval is used. The output of the Asynchronous Build process is an array of resource states that are used in generating a recovery process.

The T3→T4 interval is the time to build the recovery process (or take other action). For the dynamic technique provided by BR, the average time to build the process for recovery is maintained by BR. This average (referred to herein as avg34) is used to determine the interval between T3 and T4.

A projection of recovery time covering the interval from T4→T5 is made, for the dynamic technique, based on, for instance, historical information on recovery operation execution times. Operation timings can be specified by the customer or based on historical measurements. In the embodiment herein, operation timings are associated with a customer configuration, termed a Pattern System Environment (PSE). Operating timings for recovery are used in conjunction with operation dependencies and operation ordering requirements to build a programmatic Gantt chart reflecting recovery operation sequences. From the Gantt chart, a projected recovery operation time is derived (referred to herein as projected45).

The framework for event timing is designed to run based on timers set to transition between discrete steps in the process. However, as the technique depends on the passage of real time, there exists the potential for processing to be stopped or delayed. Examples include: error correction processing of the computer system; stop conditions manually or programmatically occurring during processing; and/or disabling for interrupt processing time of the computer system. Since real time can pass without the assurance of the provided for timer interrupts, checks are included within the technique to determine if the current real-time is past the time where T2 or T3 should have transitioned the technique to a subsequent step.

Multiple mechanisms may be employed to determine if stop conditions have occurred. One technique tests for expired intervals explicitly. Alternatively, the timer services may be utilized which accept a time of day (TOD) value when setting a timer. If the current TOD is past the TOD for which notification is requested, an error indication may be returned by the timer service. Alternatively, the timer service may set the timer and have it immediately expire. In all cases, there exists a delay between the time when a timer is requested to be set and when that request is processed. If hardware is utilized to establish the timer, a potential exists for the computer system to be stopped before the hardware is initialized. There exists a potential of not receiving the timer event if the computer system is not enabled for notification from the hardware. If software timing services are utilized, there exists a duration of time where the software may not be operational to provide notification of time duration expiration.

Description of Sliding Window Technique

One embodiment of the logic to calculate intervals is described with reference to FIGS. 11A-11E. In one example, this logic is performed by the BRM component of the BR system. Prior to describing the specifics, however, a summary of the processing is provided.

To set T2 and T3, the following processing occurs, in one example.

-   -   Determine if BR dynamic, BR fixed or a customer specified         routine is current for the RS.     -   Calculate both an initial value for T2 and T3, as well as time         remaining to T2 and T3 from when the first error was reported         for events reporting subsequent errors that have been merged         with the CR.     -   For BR dynamic technique:         -   Project a time (projected45) for the interval T4 to T5 for             recovery operation execution based on operation timings in             the one current PSE for a non-shared resource or on the             average of operation timings from all current PSEs for a             shared resource.         -   Create a Gantt chart from the list of recovery operations             accumulated.         -   Determine recovery operation time from the Gantt chart             representing operation ordering and operation overlap.         -   Determine T2 and T3 intervals and point in time TOD values             from avg23 time (average time to gather resource state),             avg34 time (average time to build recovery workflow), and             projected45 time from the recovery operation execution             duration time and RTO.     -   For BR fixed technique:         -   T2 interval and point in time TOD are set from the average             of resource state query times for the RS associated with the             CR having the smallest RTO.         -   T3 interval and point in time TOD are set to the largest             time for a resource to respond to a query for state from the             set of resources associated with the set of RSs associated             with the CR.     -   For customer technique:         -   T2 interval and point in time TOD are set from the RS having             the smallest RTO as either fixed or calculated from the avg             and std dev of resources in that RS response to query.         -   T3 interval and point in time TOD are set from the RS having             the resource with the longest response to a query for state             as either fixed or calculated from the average, standard             deviation and maximum of resource response to query times.     -   Intervals are returned for time to T2 and T3.

As described with reference to FIGS. 11A-11E, CalculateInterval Window calculates intervalT2 and intervalT3 for both initial event and time left conditions. It is invoked when a Containment Region is initially created, when a new event is merged into a Containment Region or when Containment Regions are merged as a result of response to status query processing, as examples.

Referring initially to FIG. 11A, from the set of RS(s) recorded as affected in the CR, the one with the smallest RTO is selected, STEP 1100. This is the time within which processing of the event timing framework is to complete. It is saved in a variable, RTO_To_Wait, STEP 1102. Thereafter, a determination is made as to whether the dynamic technique is to be used, INQUIRY 1104. If the dynamic technique is to be used for the RS, processing continues by determining dependency order operations, STEP 1106.

In one example, dependency operation ordering logic builds an ordered set of operations taking into account dependencies between resources and their operations. The input to the logic is a set of operations on resources, some of which may require including other dependent operations. The output is an ordered list of operations, including any dependent operations not originally in the list. In this implementation, the information on dependency of operations is determined using pairing constructs that describe the relationships between resources. In other implementations, information on dependencies between operations could be described in a relational table, or other external file. In a further implementation, the priority of operations to consider in the chain of dependent operations can be included in the logic. The processing for dependency operation ordering is, for instance, a three pass process. In the first pass, the set of input operations are analyzed and any dependent operation is incorporated into the set. In the next pass, the operations are separated into stages such that any operations that can occur in parallel are put into the same stage, and ones that occur later are moved to subsequent states. In the final pass, each operation, resource pair in the ordered list is updated with a list of operations that are to occur after the pair. This list is represented as an array of indexes, where each index value is identifying a specific operation, resource pair in the ordered list.

Thereafter, a Gantt chart is built, STEP 1108. In one example, a Build_Gantt_Chart routine is invoked to build a programmatic representation of a Gantt chart, which takes as input a set of data on operations and creates output, which includes a matrix of operations and timings, along with an overall maximum time for operation execution. Input to the routine includes a set of data, ordered_op_list, which has elements that include a set of data on each operation, opentry. Elements of the set are in execution order sequence, as one example. Each opentry element includes, for instance: a resource identity, operation, sequence number of operation, operation execution time and a list of the index(s) into the ordered_op_list for operation(s), if any exist, which are to occur after the operation in the element (e.g., resource, op, seq#, op_exec_time, op_after(n)). The matrix generated by the routine has three columns and one row for each input operation. The first column of each row includes the input data on a resource/operation, the second column is the start time relative to 0 for the operation, and the third column is the end time relative to 0 of the operation. Additionally, a field is returned, maxtime, which is the maximum time for execution of the set of operations.

Processing is performed in two phases. In the first phase, a table is built that includes one row for each unique path through the sequence of operations. The input ordered_op_list is indexed by the variable i_ordered_op_list. The result of phase one processing is a table, outlist_table. The index i_next_available_row indicates the row within outlist_table where the next unique sequence through the set of operations will be built. Processing proceeds by locating each input operation with the lowest operation sequence number. Each of these is a root of unique paths through the set of operations. The set of these operations is processed sequentially with unique paths through the set of operations for the first root completing before processing the unique paths through the set of operations for the second root.

Processing for a root begins by assigning the current row in the outlist_table to the index current_orow_index and incrementing the i_next_available_row index. Within the row being processed, an index to the current operation being processed is maintained, index_for_ops. Processing proceeds through the list of operations in the input. A new row is created in outlist_table when more than one input operation is to occur after the current operation being processed. Two indicators are kept with each row of the outlist_table. The row_changed indicator is used to cause a copy of the row to be made before a new operation which is to occur later in the sequence is added. Associated with each row there are two fields used to save progress in processing the sequence: ordered_op_next is an index into the input ordered_op_list for the last operation in the sequence; op_next is an index into the row for the last operation in the sequence. Entries in the row include the index into the input ordered_op_list for operations comprising the sequence.

When a new row is created, it is initialized with the sequence of operations in the current row that have been accumulated to that point of processing. The second indicator associated with each row, row_end, is used to identify a row which is a complete path through the sequence of operations.

The next row is processed in the same manner as the first row of a root. Processing for a root is determined to have recorded every unique path through the sequence of operations when there were no copied rows made during processing of the current row. When all unique paths through the set of operations for the first root has completed, processing continues with the second and subsequent roots.

The second phase of processing builds the output of the routine, Gantt_table and maxtime. The maximum time for execution of the sequence of operations is set in maxtime. The Gantt_table includes one row for each opentry in the ordered_op_list input. An entry in the Gantt_table includes the opentry provided as input, a start time relative to 0 and an end time relative to 0 for the operation.

The Build_Gantt_Chart routine returns an overall time required for execution of the operations required for recovery processing. This time interval is saved in Estimated45 (a.k.a., projected45; set by maxtime returned from Gantt routine), STEP 1110.

In order to calculate the time required for all resources in the CR to respond to a request for state, a list of resource response times is created. The List_Responset is initially set to null, STEP 1112. For each resource in the CR, STEP 1114, the average response to poll time for the resource is included in the List_Responset, STEP 1116. Thereafter, the average and standard deviation for response to poll times for the resources in the CR are calculated, STEP 1118 (FIG. 11B). The time interval between T2 and T3, AvgT23, is set to the average and twice the standard deviation for response times of resources currently in the CR, STEP 1120.

The time elapsed from first event notification until the current time is calculated and saved in time_used, STEP 1122. The time required to build the recovery process, Avg34, is based on historical data maintained in the BRM table. The average of previous recovery process build times plus twice the standard deviation is calculated and saved in Avg34, STEP 1124.

The T3 interval is set to RTO_To_Wait minus Estimated45 minus Avg34 minus Time_Used, STEP 1126. T2 interval is set to the T3 interval just calculated minus Avg23, STEP 1128.

Processing is to insure the time intervals calculated have not already expired. If the T3 interval is negative, INQUIRY 1130, it has already expired. A value equal to the Time_Used minus one is returned to indicate the T3 interval has expired, STEP 1132. If the T3 interval has already expired, the T2 interval has also expired. Thus, the T2 interval is set to Time_Used minus 2 to reflect T2 interval expiration, STEP 1134.

Returning to INQUIRY 1130, if the T3 interval has not expired, the T2 interval is tested for expiration, INQUIRY 1136 (FIG. 11C). If the T2 interval has not yet expired, the technique returns T2 and T3 intervals from the current time. If the T2 interval has expired, the T2 interval is set to Time_Used minus 1 to reflect T2 interval expiration, STEP 1138.

Returning to INQUIRY 1104 (FIG. 11A), if the dynamic technique is not current for the RS, a determination is made as to whether the fixed (a.k.a., default) technique is current for the RS, INQUIRY 1140 (FIG. 11D). If the default technique is current for the RS, processing continues to set the T2 and T3 interval based on response to periodic polling statistics. T2 is set to the average polling event responses plus twice the standard deviation less time already elapsed as calculated from the current TOD minus the first event TOD in the CR, STEP 1142. The T3 interval is set to the maximum poll event plus two standard deviations minus the time already elapsed as calculated from the current TOD minus the first event TOD in the CR, STEP 1144. Processing then continues to check for T3 and T2 expiration at INQUIRY 1130 (FIG. 11B).

Returning to INQUIRY 1140 (FIG. 11D), if the fixed technique is not current for the RS, then customer provided timings are to be applied. Thus, a determination is made regarding calculated or fixed timings, INQUIRY 1148 (FIG. 11E). For fixed T2 timings, T2 is set to the fixed value provided minus the elapsed time as calculated from the current TOD minus the first event TOD in the CR, STEP 1150. Thereafter, processing continues at INQUIRY 1156, described below

Referring again to INQUIRY 1148, for arithmetic calculation of T2, the provided formula is applied to event response time statistics in the RS, STEP 1152. The T2 interval is set to the calculated time interval minus time already elapsed as calculated from the current TOD minus the first event TOD from the CR, STEP 1154. Processing then continues to INQUIRY 1156.

At INQUIRY 1156, if a fixed T3 customer provided time is to be utilized, the T3 interval is set to the specified time interval minus time already elapsed as calculated from the current TOD minus first event TOD from the CR, STEP 1158. Otherwise, the provided formula is applied to the event statistics from the RS, STEP 1160, and the calculated time is lessened by the amount of already elapsed time and returned as the T3 interval, STEP 1162.

Processing continues with checking for T2 and T3 having already expired, INQUIRY 1130 (FIG. 11B). This concludes description of the Calculate Interval Window Logic.

The Calculate Interval Window logic is used, for example, in creating a new CR for the timing framework, as described below.

New CR Processing for Timing Framework

One embodiment of the logic associated with new CR processing for the timing framework is described with reference to FIG. 12. In one example, this logic is processed by the BRM component of the BR system.

On first event notification, the timing framework is set up as part of creating a new CR. The FirstEventTOD field is set in the CR equal to the current TOD, STEP 1200. Further, the CR progress indicator is set to the T1→T2 phase, STEP 1202, and the CalculateIntervalWindow routine is invoked, which calculates and returns T2 interval and T3 interval, STEP 1204, as described above.

If the T3 interval has expired, INQUIRY 1206, which is determined, in one example, by comparing FirstEventTOD from the CR added to the T3 interval with the current TOD, a CloseSlidingWindow routine (described below), is invoked, STEP 1208. This check detects delays in processing which have progressed real time beyond the end of the time when resource status requests are to be processed. The CloseSlidingWindow routine progresses the CR to the next phase of processing.

If the T3 interval has not expired, INQUIRY 1206, an interval timer is set for the T3 interval with timer expiration to give control to the CloseSlidingWindow routine, STEP 1210.

Moreover, if the T2 interval has expired, INQUIRY 1212, which is determined, in one example, by comparing FirstEventTOD from the CR added to the T2 interval with the current TOD, the Asynch Query Build routine is invoked, STEP 1214. This check detects delays in processing which have progressed real time beyond the end of the time when requests for resource status are to be initiated.

Returning to INQUIRY 1212, if the T2 interval has not expired, an interval timer is set for the T2 interval with timer expiration to give control to the Asynch Query Build routine, STEP 1216. This concludes description of the New CR processing logic.

Customer Modification of Timings

As described above, customers may specify T2 and T3 as either fixed time intervals or time intervals calculated from simple arithmetic operations on the average and standard deviation of resource response to query time.

One embodiment of the logic employed by customers to modify timings is described with reference to FIGS. 13A-13C. In one example, this processing is invoked by UI and performed by the RS component of the BR system.

Referring initially to FIG. 13A, selection of the RS for which timings are to be provided may be performed by starting with the list of defined BRM(s) presented through the UI, STEP 1300, from which a specific BRM may be selected, STEP 1302. For the selected BRM, the set of related RS(s) is presented, STEP 1304, from which a specific RS may be selected, STEP 1306. Alternatively, the RS to be modified can be specified directly (hence, Start 2).

Thereafter, a determination is made as to whether the RS state is being actively monitored for availability, INQUIRY 1308. If the RS is not actively being monitored for availability, an error is presented via the UI, STEP 1310, and processing ends. Otherwise, for an actively monitored RS, the average and standard deviation of event responses to periodic polls and the maximum time for a response to periodic polls, along with the standard deviation, are presented, STEP 1312.

Further, since intervals may be specified as fixed values or as simple arithmetic formulas, a request is made, via the UI, for a formula or fixed T2, STEP 1314. If a formula for T2 is specified, INQUIRY 1316, the formula is applied to the current event statistics for validation, STEP 1318. Thereafter, or if a formula for T2 is not specified, a request for a fixed T3 or formula specification is made via the UI, STEP 1320 (FIG. 13B). If a formula for T3 is specified, INQUIRY 1322, the formula is applied to the current event statistics for validation, STEP 1324. Thereafter, or if a formula for T3 is not specified, processing continues with validation of the values for T2 and T3.

Validation of the values provided for T2 and T3 has multiple steps. In a first step, T3 is verified to be greater than T2, INQUIRY 1326. If T3 is not greater than T2, an error is presented along with the T2 and T3 values, STEP 1328, and processing returns to interval specification, STEP 1312 (FIG. 13A). Otherwise, of the resources associated with the RS, the minimum and maximum event response times are determined, STEP 1330 (FIG. 13B). If the interval from T2 to T3 is less than either the minimum or maximum event response times, INQUIRY 1332, a warning message is generated as some responses or all responses may not be expected to arrive in the specified window, STEP 1334.

Thereafter, or if the interval is not less than the minimum or maximum event response times, validation continues by selecting the PSE for which validation of the RS goal has a minimum RTO, STEP 1336. The resource recovery operation having the largest and smallest operation execution duration times are determined, STEP 1340 (FIG. 13C). If the minimum RTO less the T3 interval is less than the projected recovery time for the total RS, INQUIRY 1342, insufficient time is provided for recovery of the entire RS given the T3 specification. Thus, a warning is issued via the UI, STEP 1344. Thereafter, or if RTO less the T3 interval is not less than the projected recovery time for the total RS, processing continues with INQUIRY 1346. If the RTO less the T3 interval is less than the longest recovery operation execution duration, INQUIRY 1346, insufficient time is provided for recovery of some of the resources associated with the RS given the T3 specification; thus, a warning is issued via the UI, STEP 1348. Thereafter, or if it is not less, if the RTO less the T3 interval is less than the shortest recovery operation execution duration, INQUIRY 1350, insufficient time is provided for recovery of any resource associated with the RS given the T3 specification; thus, an error is issued via the UI, STEP 1352, and processing continues at interval specification, STEP 1312 (FIG. 13A).

When valid specification of T2 and T3 interval has been achieved, the RS is updated with the interval and an indication of customer provided interval specification, STEP 1354 (FIG. 13C). This completes processing of the customer modifications to timings.

Asynch Query Build and Close Sliding Window

In various processing described above, (e.g., T2, T3 Expiration and New CR Processing for Timing Network), an Asynch Query Build routine and a Close Sliding Window routine are employed. Further details relating to these routines are described below.

Asynchronous Query Build

When an intermediary interval is reached in the timeline for a CR and BR has detected that most failed resources are likely to have reported a failure (T2 point in time and at expiration of T2 interval), BR explicitly gathers state from the impacted set of resources to ensure their value for state is more recent than the last event received. This is accomplished via the Asynchronous Query Build routine, which is invoked via expiration of a timer interval and is performed by the BRM component of the BR system. As the name implies, this routine runs asynchronously, in this embodiment.

In the phase where BR is still accepting related incoming errors, the CR is built to include only related resources that are one step away in a graph. In ballooning the CR further, the pairing information in the BRRD (e.g., impact assessment rules) is used to determine whether there is an impact to other resources and to build out the CR to include the full set of impacted resources.

As part of this asynchronous query build process, if it is detected that resources in the CR impact other resources, such that they become failed and/or degraded (based, for instance, on operation impact pairing rules), these impacted resources are added to the CR to help creation of the recovery process.

From pairings, it is determined if there are other resources which could cause a resource in the CR to become failed or degraded. These perpetrating candidates are added to the CR with a reason as questioning their perpetration, qperp. Thus, resource data is retrieved. Analysis of the root cause determines if a resource is failed or degraded and if reported explicitly, implicated from a pairing, or retrieved based on being questioned as a perpetrator.

During this process, the CR is ballooned, which means that if it is detected that resources in the CR impact other resources such that they become failed and/or degraded (based on operation impact pairing rules), these impacted resources are added to the CR as well; multiple CR's may be merged, if there are intersections found that are not just at the RS level; resources which may have caused other CR included resources to become failed or degraded based on impact pairings are included in the CR for query processing; and asynchronous requests to the appropriate BRAD(s) are sent.

Referring to FIG. 14A, input to AsynchQueryBuild is the CR for which processing is to be performed. The CR is retrieved and serialized, STEP 1400. Since multiple concurrent processes may have attempted to invoke the AsynchQueryBuild routine, a check is made to determine if processing is required, e.g., if CRQBState is initial and the CRQBTOD matches the MostCurrentEventTOD, INQUIRY 1401. If processing is not to be performed by this instance of AsynchQueryBuild, processing is terminated. Otherwise, the CR is updated to reflect CRQBState is in process, STEP 1402, and the CR is externally recorded in the CR table, STEP 1403. If the update fails, INQUIRY 1404, the processing of AsynchQueryBuild is restarted.

Otherwise, an in-memory list of resources from the CR is created, ImpactedResList, from the resource information in the CR (e.g. CR.States), STEP 1405. Data initialized in the ImpactedResList includes the resource, resource(s) which caused it to be in the CR, resource state and reason(s)—e.g., failed, degraded, implicated, question perpetration. Further, an index for processing the ImpactedResList is initialized to the top of the list, STEP 1406.

If there are resources to be processed, INQUIRY 1407 (FIG. 14B), for each resource in the ImpactedResList, the BRMD is retrieved without serialization, STEP 1408. The resource state from the BRMD is used to update the ImpactedResList as additional periodic poll or query events may have caused the BRMD to be updated, STEP 1409. If the resource has aggregated state, INQUIRY 1410, an evaluation of aggregated state is performed using cached data for other resource state and property/values, STEP 1411. The calculated aggregated state is saved in the ImpactedResList, STEP 1412.

Thereafter, or if the resource does not have aggregated state, impact pairings with a matching Resource 1 index are retrieved from the BRRD, STEP 1413. This reflects the resources which may become failed or degraded as a result of this resource being failed or degraded. Trigger conditions for the pairings are evaluated, STEP 1414, to determine if the pairing is applicable at this point in time. Each pairing is processed until all pairings for this resource have been evaluated, STEP 1415 (FIG. 14C), and then, the next resource in the ImpactedResList is to be processed, STEP 1416.

For the pairing, Resource 2 is tested as to whether it is from a pairing in the ImpactedResList, INQUIRY 1417. If an array entry exists for Resource 2, data on the resource are updated, including, for instance, ReasonForInclusion, State and Reason, STEP 1418. The pairing is added to the pairings used in forming the CR, CR.PairingsUsed, STEP 1419, and processing continues at STEP 1415.

Returning to INQUIRY 1417, if Resource 2 from the pairing is not already in the ImpactedResList, it is added in a new array entry, STEP 1420. Resource 2 is also added to the CR.States array in a new entry, STEP 1421. Data for Resource 2 are updated in the ImpactedResList, STEP 1422, and in the CR.States array, STEP 1423, including, for instance, ReasonForInclusion, State and Reason. The mechanism for requesting information about the resource is also saved as part of the Resource 2 data, e.g. the BRAD, in one implementation, STEP 1424.

If Resource 2 has aggregated state, INQUIRY 1425, the aggregated state is evaluated using cached data for other resources, STEP 1426, and saved in the ImpactedResList, STEP 1427, and the CR.States array, STEP 1428. The pairing is added to the CR, STEP 1419, and the next pairing is evaluated, STEP 1415.

If Resource 2 does not have aggregated state, INQUIRY 1425, processing continues with STEP 1419. When all pairings have been evaluated for the current resource, the next resource in the ImpactedResList is selected for processing, STEP 1416.

Returning to INQUIRY 1407, when all resources identified with the CR to this point have been processed, an evaluation of CR merge requirements is made. First, the CR(s) associated with this BRM which are in a phase of accepting new events, T1→T2, or querying resource data, T2→T3, are selected from the CR table, STEP 1429 (FIG. 14D). The list of CR(s) returned is processed one at a time, INQUIRY 1430, with the next list entry being selected, STEP 1431. An intersection of resources in the CR.States array and the ImpactedResList array is formed, STEP 1432. If the intersect is null, INQUIRY 1433, the next CR entry is processed, INQUIRY 1430. Otherwise, the CR with intersecting resources is added to the CR_List, STEP 1434, and processing returns to INQUIRY 1430.

When all CR(s) returned have been processed, INQUIRY 1430, those that do not have intersecting resources are unlocked, STEP 1435. If the CR_List has a single entry, INQUIRY 1436, processing to merge CR(s) is not needed, and thus, processing continues at STEP 1455 (FIG. 14G), as described below. Otherwise, the CR from the CR_List having the oldest first event TOD is selected, STEP 1437 (FIG. 14D) and all other CR(s) in the CR_List are deselected.

For each deselected CR from the CR_List, STEP 1438 (FIG. 14E), an indicator is set for CR processing to end, ToBeEnded, STEP 1439. Each resource in the deselected CR is processed, STEP 1440. If the resource exists in the ImpactedResList already, INQUIRY 1441, a comparison of data on the resource in the CR.States array entry and the ImpactedResList is made to determine if an update of the ImpactedResList entry is required, INQUIRY 1442. If so, the ReasonForInclusion, State and Reason from the CR.States array entry is added to the array entry in the ImpactedResList, STEP 1443, and the selected CR.States array entry, STEP 1444. Processing then continues at STEP 1440.

Returning to INQUIRY 1442, if an update is not required, then processing flows to STEP 1440.

Returning to INQUIRY 1441, if the resource did not already exist in the ImpactedResList, it is added along with data on ReasonForInclusion, State and Reason to the ImpactedResList, STEP 1445, and the selected CR.States array, STEP 1446. Processing then continues at STEP 1440.

When all resources have been processed for the CR, STEP 1440, the pairings from the deselected CR are merged with the pairings in the selected CR, STEP 1447 (FIG. 14F). If the T2 interval timer for the deselected CR has been set, INQUIRY 1448, it is cancelled through, for instance, invocation of system services, STEP 1449. Thereafter, or if the T2 interval timer is not set, if the T3 interval timer for the deselected CR has been set, INQUIRY 1450, it is also cancelled through, for instance, invocation of system services, STEP 1451. Thereafter, or if the T3 timer is not set, the deselected CR is prepared for reuse by setting the CR.Progress indicator to Free, STEP 1452. Latent resource data query responses are discarded as a result of updating the most recent event TOD, CR.MostRecentEventTOD, STEP 1453. Also, the deselected CR is recorded in the CR table and serialization is released, STEP 1454, and processing continues at STEP 1438 (FIG. 14E).

When the deselected CRs are processed, processing continues with INQUIRY 1455 (FIG. 14G). Similarly, if no CR merge processing is required, INQUIRY 1436 (FIG. 14D), processing continues at STEP 1455.

When CR merge processing has completed, INQUIRY 1438, or is not required, INQUIRY 1436, AsynchQueryBuild searches for resources which have not reported an event, but which may have been the cause of “failed” or “degraded” reported events. Processing begins by forming a directed acyclic graph (DAG) of the resources in the CR.States array using the saved pairings used, STEP 1455 (FIG. 14G). An index to add resources to the end of the list of impacted resources (ImpactedResList) is set to the current end of the array, STEP 1456. For each leaf node in the DAG, there exists the possibility of a perpetrating resource which caused the reported event.

Thus, for each leaf node in the DAG, STEP 1457, impact pairings with the leaf node as Resource 2, the effected resource, are selected from the BRRD table, STEP 1458. Trigger conditions for the returned pairings are evaluated using unserialized BRMD data to determine if the pairing is currently applicable, STEP 1459.

For each returned pairing which is currently applicable, STEP 1460, the pairing is added to the parings used in building the CR, CR.ParingsUsed, STEP 1461. If Resource 1 from the pairing is already in the ImpactedResList, INQUIRY 1462, the next pairing is evaluated, STEP 1460. Otherwise, Resource 1 is added to the ImpactedResList in the array located by the index for adding perpetrating resources, STEP 1463. The Reason for the resource being part of the CR is indicated as questioning perpetration, qperp. Resource 1 is also added to the CR.States array with Reason qperp, STEP 1464. The mechanism to request data regarding Resource 1 is saved, STEP 1465, and the next array location for adding perpetrating resources to ImpactedResList is updated, STEP 1466, before evaluating the next pairing, STEP 1460.

Processing continues for the pairings for each leaf node. Thereafter, having located the first candidate for perpetrating resources being in the CR, the chain of resources having the ability to result in the perpetrating resource being failed or degraded is processed with each node in the chain added to the CR for evaluation as a perpetrating resource. Processing begins by setting an index for additions to the ImpactedResList where the first available array entry exist, at iqperp, STEP 1467 (FIG. 14H). The index into the ImpactedResList for perpetrating resources is reset to the beginning of the perpetrating resource candidates, ires, STEP 1468. When the last perpetrating resource candidate has been evaluated, INQUIRY 1469, processing continues by forming request messages for resource data, STEP 1480 (FIG. 14I), as described below.

However, if there are still more perpetrating resource candidates to be evaluated, INQUIRY 1469 (FIG. 14H), processing continues, as described herein. Processing for a perpetrating resource may add entries to the ImpactedResList as pairings are evaluated which identify the potential for impact of one resource to effect another already in the CR. Impact pairings with Resource 2 matching the perpetrating resource being processed are retrieved from the BRRD, STEP 1470. Trigger conditions for the returned pairings are evaluated to determine if the pairing is currently applicable, STEP 1471.

For each pairing evaluated as currently applicable, STEP 1472, the pairing is added to the list of pairings used to form the CR, STEP 1473. If Resource 1 from the pairing (i.e., the resource for which a change may cause a failed or degraded condition) is already in the ImpactedResList, INQUIRY 1474, the next pairing returned is selected for evaluation, STEP 1472. Otherwise, Resource 1 from the pairing is added to the ImpactedResList at the end, STEP 1475, and added to the CR.States array with Reason set to qperp, STEP 1476. The mechanism to request resource data regarding resource 1 is saved, STEP 1477, and the next location for resources to be added to the ImpactedResList is updated, STEP 1478. Processing then proceeds to STEP 1472.

When all pairings have been evaluated, iqprep is incremented, STEP 1479, and processing continues with INQUIRY 1469. When all perpetrating resources have been identified, the CR parings used is updated, STEP 1480 (FIG. 14I), and the CR is updated in the CR table, STEP 1481.

The final phase of processing for AsynchQueryBuild forms messages to be sent to the centralized focal point for gathering resource data on a system image basis. An index is set to the beginning of the ImpactedResList to step through the resource entries in the array, STEP 1482. When the last resource has been processed, INQUIRY 1483, AsynchQueryBuild has completed. Otherwise, for the indexed resource in the ImpactedResList, a determination is made if it has already been processed, i.e., has this resource already been included in a request for data message, INQUIRY 1484. If so, the next resource in the ImpactedResList is selected, STEP 1485.

For each resource in the ImpactedResList which has not already been processed, INQUIRY 1484, an in-memory list of resources for which data is being requested, BRAD_List, is set to null, STEP 1486, and then updated with the resource from the ImpactedResList, STEP 1487. Further, the entry in the ImpactedResList is marked as processed, STEP 1488.

For every subsequent resource in the ImpactedResList, an index is established, STEP 1489 (FIG. 14J), and each remaining array entry is processed. For each remaining ImpactedResList array entry, if the resource is not on the same system as the seed resource placed in the BRAD_List, INQUIRY 1490, the entry is skipped and the next entry selected for evaluation, STEP 1493. For those resources on the same system, INQUIRY 1490, the resource is added to the BRAD_List of resources for which resource data is being requested, STEP 1491, the associated ImpactedResList entry is marked as processed, STEP 1492, and the index is incremented, STEP 1493.

When all resources in the ImpactedResList have been evaluated, STEP 1489, a determination is made if the mechanism for retrieving data for resources has been established, INQUIRY 1494. If not, the system hosting the BRM is selected as the target for the resource data request message, STEP 1495. Thereafter, or if the mechanism has been established, a state query for resource data is initiated to the mechanism for requesting resource data, STEP 1496, and the requested target is saved for later processing when the response message is received, STEP 1497. Finally the next entry in the ImpactedResList is indexed for evaluation, STEP 1485 (FIG. 14I).

Close Sliding Window

The interval timer for expiration of the T3 interval gives control to the CloseSlidingWindow routine. The T3 time interval from the first event notification causing creation of the CR represents the latest point in time where responses to asynchronous query build requests for resource state and property/value data can be accepted. The T3 time interval may be established in a variety of ways including fixed intervals provided within the product offering, fixed intervals defined by the customer or variable intervals. The CR progress is updated to reflect processing being in the T3 T4 phase. All subsequent responses received in response to asynchronous query build requests are discarded. If responses to all queries for resource status subsequent to the most recent event notification related to the CR have not been received, control is passed to processing which substitutes cached resource state and property values for missing resource status responses. Otherwise, control is passed to processing to formulate the recovery process.

One embodiment of the logic associated with the close sliding window routine is described with reference to FIG. 15. In one example, this logic is performed by the BRM. Referring to FIG. 15, the CR associated with the ending T3 interval is retrieved with serialization, STEP 1500. If the CR.Progress reflects T2→T3 processing and the Cr.MostCurrentEventTod is equal the CRQBTOD representing query processing for the most current event associated with the CR, INQUIRY 1502, processing continues. Otherwise, this routine terminates as the CR has been merged or is already being processed.

In continuing, the CR.Progress is updated to reflect phase T3→T4 processing, in process of building a recovery process, STEP 1504, and recorded with serialization continued to be held by this process, STEP 1506. Each BRAD_List entry associated with the CR is examined to determine if a response to the latest AsynchQueryBuild request was received, STEP 1508. When all CR.BRAD_List entries have been processed, the formation of a recovery process is initiated with resource state and property/values provided as input in the CR, STEP 1510.

For each entry, if the CRQBTOD of the BRAD_List entry being processed matches the CR.MostCurrentEventTOD, INQUIRY 1512, a response to the latest asynchronous query build request was received and current resource state and property/values were retrieved. Thus, processing returns to STEP 1508. Otherwise, for each resource in the CR, STEP 1514, a determination is made as to whether that resource is associated with the BRAD which failed to provide a most current response, INQUIRY 1516. If not, processing continues to STEP 1514. Otherwise, for such resources, the cached data for state, aggregated state and property/value data is filled into the CR.States array, STEP 1518. Processing then continues to STEP 1514. This concludes the close window processing.

Related Processing

Calculate Interval Windows and/or associated processing may be invoked during related BR processing. For example, in a routine, AssociateWithExistingCR, in which processing is performed, on event notification, to combine two or more CR(s), CalculateIntervalWindows is invoked to recalculate the T2 and T3 intervals. Processing on return is the same as on establishing T2 and T3 intervals when creating a new CR.

Additionally, when a CR has completed processing due to being subsumed by another CR, processing to cancel the T2 and T3 interval timers is performed. If processing has not been initiated to retrieve resource state, there are no outstanding responses to be processed. If processing to retrieve resource state has been initiated, response messages may be in the process of being created and returned. When received, response messages identify the CR and the event for which the resource status was requested. If the CR has been subsumed, processing detects that the response is not needed and the response is discarded.

Described in detail herein is a capability for managing an IT environment that is facilitated by employing dynamically adjusted discrete phases or processing to obtain a set of event related information used in managing the environment.

One or more aspects of the present invention can be included in an article of manufacture (e.g., one or more computer program products) having, for instance, computer usable media. The media has therein, for instance, computer readable program code means or logic (e.g., instructions, code, commands, etc.) to provide and facilitate the capabilities of the present invention. The article of manufacture can be included as a part of a computer system or sold separately.

One example of an article of manufacture or a computer program product incorporating one or more aspects of the present invention is described with reference to FIG. 16. A computer program product 1600 includes, for instance, one or more computer usable media 1602 to store computer readable program code means or logic 1604 thereon to provide and facilitate one or more aspects of the present invention. The medium can be an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system (or apparatus or device) or a propagation medium. Examples of a computer readable medium include a semiconductor or solid state memory, magnetic tape, a removable computer diskette, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), a rigid magnetic disk and an optical disk. Examples of optical disks include compact disk-read only memory (CD-ROM), compact disk-read/write (CD-R/W) and DVD.

A sequence of program instructions or a logical assembly of one or more interrelated modules defined by one or more computer readable program code means or logic direct the performance of one or more aspects of the present invention.

Advantageously, a capability is provided for formalizing discrete phases of processing to wait to initiate gathering of state information, to have a point in time in which a query to obtain current state information is initiated, to formalize the period of time for taking action, such as building a recovery process, and to take action (e.g., execute the recovery process). Advantageously, the points in time are adjustable based on real-time events that are reported or detected through status queries. The event may be related to availability, or to other types of events (e.g., dispatching, configuration changes, etc.), as examples. Advantageously, the amount of time to wait to obtain a set of related events is dynamically adjustable.

Although various embodiments are described above, these are only examples. For example, the processing environments described herein are only examples of environments that may incorporate and use one or more aspects of the present invention. Environments may include other types of processing units or servers or the components in each processing environment may be different than described herein. Each processing environment may include additional, less and/or different components than described herein. Further, the types of central processing units and/or operating systems or other types of components may be different than described herein. Again, these are only provided as examples.

Moreover, an environment may include an emulator (e.g., software or other emulation mechanisms), in which a particular architecture or subset thereof is emulated. In such an environment, one or more emulation functions of the emulator can implement one or more aspects of the present invention, even though a computer executing the emulator may have a different architecture than the capabilities being emulated. As one example, in emulation mode, the specific instruction or operation being emulated is decoded, and an appropriate emulation function is built to implement the individual instruction or operation.

In an emulation environment, a host computer includes, for instance, a memory to store instructions and data; an instruction fetch unit to obtain instructions from memory and to optionally, provide local buffering for the obtained instruction; an instruction decode unit to receive the instruction fetched and to determine the type of instructions that have been fetched; and an instruction execution unit to execute the instructions. Execution may include loading data into a register for memory; storing data back to memory from a register; or performing some type of arithmetic or logical operation, as determined by the decode unit. In one example, each unit is implemented in software. For instance, the operations being performed by the units are implemented as one or more subroutines within emulator software.

Further, a data processing system suitable for storing and/or executing program code is usable that includes at least one processor coupled directly or indirectly to memory elements through a system bus. The memory elements include, for instance, local memory employed during actual execution of the program code, bulk storage, and cache memory which provide temporary storage of at least some program code in order to reduce the number of times code must be retrieved from bulk storage during execution.

Input/Output or I/O devices (including, but not limited to, keyboards, displays, pointing devices, DASD, tape, CDs, DVDs, thumb drives and other memory media, etc.) can be coupled to the system either directly or through intervening I/O controllers. Network adapters may also be coupled to the system to enable the data processing system to become coupled to other data processing systems or remote printers or storage devices through intervening private or public networks. Modems, cable modems, and Ethernet cards are just a few of the available types of network adapters.

Further, although the environments described herein are related to the management of availability of a customer's environment, one or more aspects of the present invention may be used to manage aspects other than or in addition to availability. Further, one or more aspects of the present invention can be used in environments other than a business resiliency environment.

Yet further, many examples are provided herein, and these examples may be revised without departing from the spirit of the present invention. For example, in one embodiment, the description is described in terms of availability and recovery; however, other goals and/or objectives may be specified in lieu of or in addition thereto. Additionally, the resources may be other than IT resources. Further, there may be references to particular products offered by International Business Machines Corporation or other companies. These again are only offered as examples, and other products may also be used. Additionally, although tables and databases are described herein, any suitable data structure may be used. There are many other variations that can be included in the description described herein and all of these variations are considered a part of the claimed invention.

Further, for completeness in describing one example of an environment in which one or more aspects of the present invention may be utilized, certain components and/or information is described that is not needed for one or more aspects of the present invention. These are not meant to limit the aspects of the present invention in any way.

One or more aspects of the present invention can be provided, offered, deployed, managed, serviced, etc. by a service provider who offers management of customer environments. For instance, the service provider can create, maintain, support, etc. computer code and/or a computer infrastructure that performs one or more aspects of the present invention for one or more customers. In return, the service provider can receive payment from the customer under a subscription and/or fee agreement, as examples. Additionally or alternatively, the service provider can receive payment from the sale of advertising content to one or more third parties.

In one aspect of the present invention, an application can be deployed for performing one or more aspects of the present invention. As one example, the deploying of an application comprises providing computer infrastructure operable to perform one or more aspects of the present invention.

As a further aspect of the present invention, a computing infrastructure can be deployed comprising integrating computer readable code into a computing system, in which the code in combination with the computing system is capable of performing one or more aspects of the present invention.

As yet a further aspect of the present invention, a process for integrating computing infrastructure, comprising integrating computer readable code into a computer system may be provided. The computer system comprises a computer usable medium, in which the computer usable medium comprises one or more aspects of the present invention. The code in combination with the computer system is capable of performing one or more aspects of the present invention.

The capabilities of one or more aspects of the present invention can be implemented in software, firmware, hardware, or some combination thereof. At least one program storage device readable by a machine embodying at least one program of instructions executable by the machine to perform the capabilities of the present invention can be provided.

The flow diagrams depicted herein are just examples. There may be many variations to these diagrams or the steps (or operations) described therein without departing from the spirit of the invention. For instance, the steps may be performed in a differing order, or steps may be added, deleted, or modified. All of these variations are considered a part of the claimed invention.

Although embodiments have been depicted and described in detail herein, it will be apparent to those skilled in the relevant art that various modifications, additions, substitutions and the like can be made without departing from the spirit of the invention and these are therefore considered to be within the scope of the invention as defined in the following claims. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A computer-implemented method to facilitate event correlation, said method comprising: choosing, by a processor responsive to an occurrence of an event in an Information Technology (IT) environment, a containment region to be used to correlate information related to the event, the containment region comprising a defined structure that includes resources, relationships between the resources, and a formal expression of impact one resource can have on another resource and used to reflect a scope and impact of the event, and wherein the choosing comprises determining whether a new containment region is to be created and used as a chosen containment region to correlate the information related to the event or whether an already existing containment region is to be used as the chosen containment region, wherein the chosen containment region includes a reason for inclusion in the containment region table that indicates a reason a specific resource is under evaluation as potentially impacted, implicated or perpetrating by the event represented by the chosen containment region; executing a plurality of discrete phases of processing, in response to the occurrence of the event, the plurality of discrete phases comprising first occurrence of the event, time from first occurrence of the event to a time to start collecting state information, time to stop collecting the state information, time to formulate an action plan, projected time to end taking action, wherein responsive to executing one or more discrete phases of the plurality of discrete phases, a set of related information associated with the event is obtained and included in the chosen containment region; and dynamically adjusting a time interval associated with at least one discrete phase of the plurality of discrete phases used to include the set of related information in the chosen containment region, the dynamically adjusting being based on real-time status of the IT environment, said adjusting controlling an amount of time to correlate one or more other events to the event to obtain the set of related information, and wherein the adjusting the time interval to correlate the one or more other events to obtain the set of related information is based on an explicit goal of the IT environment; a time to gather one or more responses from one or more resources of the chosen containment region, the one or more resources responding to queries of state information of the one or more resources; and at least one of a new resource added to the chosen containment region, and a new event added to the chosen containment region.
 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the set of information is obtained using the formal expression of impact one resource can have on another resource.
 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the obtained set of related information is used to manage availability of the IT environment.
 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 3, wherein availability of the IT environment is managed within a specified goal.
 5. The computer-implemented method of claim 4, wherein the specified goal comprises a recovery time objective.
 6. The computer-implemented method of claim 5, wherein the recovery time objective is related to a business application of the IT environment.
 7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising selecting a technique to determine at least one of the time from first occurrence of the event to a time to start collecting state information or a time from first occurrence of the event to a time to stop collecting the state information, wherein the selecting chooses from a plurality of techniques including a default technique, a dynamic technique and a customer specified technique.
 8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the adjusting provides a delay to enable additional information relating to the event to be included in the set of related information.
 9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein one or more relationships are used to obtain the set of related information, wherein the one or more relationships comprise at least one of one or more implied relationships or one or more explicit relationships.
 10. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein time to complete each discrete phase is determined at runtime.
 11. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein time for at least one discrete phase is dynamically calculated to achieve a goal specified for the IT environment.
 12. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the chosen containment region comprises a containment region table, a pairings used table, a states table and a list of asynchronous distributors being targeted for a request for resource data.
 13. A computer system to facilitate event correlation, said computer system comprising: a memory; and a processor in communications with the memory, wherein the computer system is configured to perform a method, said method comprising: choosing, responsive to an occurrence of an event in an Information Technology (IT) environment, a containment region to be used to correlate information related to the event, the containment region comprising a defined structure that includes resources, relationships between the resources, and a formal expression of impact one resource can have on another resource and used to reflect a scope and impact of the event, and wherein the choosing comprises determining whether a new containment region is to be created and used as a chosen containment region to correlate the information related to the event or whether an already existing containment region is to be used as the chosen containment region, wherein the chosen containment region includes a reason for inclusion in the containment region table that indicates a reason a specific resource is under evaluation as potentially impacted, implicated or perpetrating by the event represented by the chosen containment region; executing a plurality of discrete phases of processing, in response to the occurrence of the event, the plurality of discrete phases comprising first occurrence of the event, time from first occurrence of the event to a time to start collecting state information, time to stop collecting the state information, time to formulate an action plan, projected time to end taking action, wherein responsive to executing one or more discrete phases of the plurality of discrete phases, a set of related information associated with the event is obtained and included in the chosen containment region; and dynamically adjusting a time interval associated with at least one discrete phase of the plurality of discrete phases used to include the set of related information in the chosen containment region, the dynamically adjusting being based on real-time status of the IT environment, said adjusting controlling an amount of time to correlate one or more other events to the event to obtain the set of related information, and wherein the adjusting the time interval to correlate the one or more other events to obtain the set of related information is based on an explicit goal of the IT environment; a time to gather one or more responses from one or more resources of the chosen containment region, the one or more resources responding to queries of state information of the one or more resources; and at least one of a new resource added to the chosen containment region, and a new event added to the chosen containment region.
 14. The computer system of claim 13, wherein the obtained set of related information is used to manage availability of the IT environment within a specified goal.
 15. The computer system of claim 13, wherein the chosen containment region comprises a containment region table, a pairings used table, a states table and a list of asynchronous distributors being targeted for a request for resource data.
 16. A computer program product for facilitating event correlation, said computer program product comprising: a non-transitory computer readable storage medium readable by a processing circuit and storing instructions for execution by the processing circuit for performing a method comprising: choosing, responsive to an occurrence of an event in an Information Technology (IT) environment, a containment region to be used to correlate information related to the event, the containment region comprising a defined structure that includes resources, relationships between the resources, and a formal expression of impact one resource can have on another resource and used to reflect a scope and impact of the event, wherein the choosing comprises determining whether a new containment region is to be created and used as a chosen containment region to correlate the information related to the event or whether an already existing containment region is to be used as the chosen containment region, wherein the chosen containment region includes a reason for inclusion in the containment region table that indicates a reason a specific resource is under evaluation as potentially impacted, implicated or perpetrating by the event represented by the chosen containment region; executing a plurality of discrete phases of processing, in response to the occurrence of the event, the plurality of discrete phases comprising first occurrence of the event, time from first occurrence of the event to a time to start collecting state information, time to stop collecting the state information, time to formulate an action plan, projected time to end taking action, wherein responsive to executing one or more discrete phases of the plurality of discrete phases, a set of related information associated with the event is obtained and included in the chosen containment region; and dynamically adjusting a time interval associated with at least one discrete phase of the plurality of discrete phases used to include the set of related information in the chosen containment region, the dynamically adjusting being based on real-time status of the IT environment, said adjusting controlling an amount of time to correlate one or more other events to the event to obtain the set of related information, and wherein the adjusting the time interval to correlate the one or more other events to obtain the set of related information is based on an explicit goal of the IT environment; a time to gather one or more responses from one or more resources of the chosen containment region, the one or more resources responding to queries of state information of the one or more resources; and at least one of a new resource added to the chosen containment region, and a new event added to the chosen containment region.
 17. The computer program product of claim 16, wherein the method further comprises using the obtained set of related information to manage availability of the IT environment within a specified goal.
 18. The computer program product of claim 16, wherein the adjusting provides a delay to enable additional information relating to the event to be included in the set of related information. 